Texas House Bill HJR34

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

• Filed: 11/12/12

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the dedication by general law of revenue of or money received by this state and money held in or deposited to an account or fund inside or outside the state treasury and the authorized expenditure or appropriation of revenue or money dedicated by general law.

Impact

If HJR34 is adopted, it would have significant implications for state financial management. It would enable the legislature to more precisely control the allocation of funds, reducing ambiguities in how state revenue can be used. This could potentially streamline budget processes and ensure that funds are directed toward specific governmental priorities, enhancing accountability. However, the likelihood of increased centralization of financial control may raise concerns regarding transparency and efficiency in state financial governance.

Summary

HJR34 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that seeks to clarify and expand the legislature's authority to dedicate revenue and money for specific purposes. The proposed amendment modifies Article VIII of the Texas Constitution by adding Section 25, which allows the legislature to designate appropriations for particular uses as long as such dedications do not conflict with existing constitutional restrictions. It emphasizes that dedicated funds must be used only for their stated purposes unless altered by a subsequent law passed by a two-thirds majority in both legislative houses.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR34 appears to be mixed among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents argue that the amendment is a positive step toward responsible fiscal management by allowing the state to clearly earmark revenues for essential projects and needs, which could lead to improved public services. Conversely, some critics see the amendment as a potential overreach of legislative authority that could limit flexibility in addressing unanticipated financial needs or emergencies, potentially threatening local governments' ability to respond to their own fiscal challenges.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the implications of dedicating revenues strictly to identified uses. Opponents worry that this could hinder the state's ability to reallocate funds in response to changing economic conditions or urgent funding requirements. Additionally, the requirement for a two-thirds majority vote to amend dedicated revenue laws might create legislative gridlock, preventing timely adjustments to funding allocations when needed. These debates reflect a broader discussion regarding the balance between responsible fiscal policy and the need for flexibility in government spending.