Texas House Bill HR252

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Recognizing February 6, 2013, as 4-H Day at the State Capitol.

Impact

The resolution further expresses recognition for the efforts of the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service and the Prairie View A&M Cooperative Extension Program, along with the numerous volunteers who have dedicated their time to enrich the 4-H experience. By promoting initiatives like Operation Military Kids, the program empowers youth to engage in community service while fostering leadership and teamwork skills. This recognition can enhance support for the program, potentially leading to increased funding and resource availability for future educational projects.

Summary

HR252 recognizes February 6, 2013, as Texas 4-H Day at the State Capitol, celebrating the contributions and impact of the 4-H program in Texas. The resolution acknowledges the historical roots of 4-H in the state, beginning with its inception in 1908 and highlighting the various educational opportunities it has provided to Texas youth, including the promotion of life skills and character development. As an expansive program, 4-H continues to engage over 600,000 young Texans, contributing to their readiness for future educational and workforce challenges.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR252 appears overwhelmingly positive, as it emphasizes the importance of youth development through structured programming such as 4-H. By highlighting the program's history and its positive impacts on participants and their communities, the resolution fosters a sense of pride and appreciation for the contributions of 4-H to Texas society. Lawmakers and community members support these efforts as vital for nurturing a skilled and responsible future generation.

Contention

While the resolution itself is non-controversial, it reflects broader discussions on the value of youth programs in the state. Promoting initiatives like 4-H can spark discussions about funding priorities within the Texas legislature and how best to support youth development programs amidst other educational needs. Additionally, balancing resources between urban and rural programs may present challenges as communities seek equitable support for youth engagement activities.