Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Impact
The impact of HJR77 is substantial, as it addresses the foundational legal definition of marriage in Texas law. By repealing the existing constitutional provision, it opens the door for potential legal recognition of same-sex marriages, aligning Texas' marriage laws with a growing movement towards marriage equality seen in many other states. This measure is significant not only for the rights of same-sex couples but also for broader civil rights in the state, as it challenges historic exclusions and potentially restructures the state's approach to legal classifications of relationships.
Summary
HJR77 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the provision in the Texas Constitution that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The resolution seeks to allow for the recognition of marriages that do not conform to this traditional definition and therefore paves the way for the possibility of same-sex marriage and other legal statuses that are similar to marriage. If approved, this amendment would eliminate the legal barrier preventing recognition of diverse marital relationships in the state of Texas.
Sentiment
Sentiment surrounding HJR77 is deeply divided. Supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary step forward in achieving equal rights for all individuals regardless of sexual orientation. They contend that the recognition of same-sex marriage is integral to ensuring fairness and justice in society. Conversely, opponents of the bill may view it as a threat to traditional values and advocate for the preservation of the historical definition of marriage. The debate encapsulates wider societal tensions regarding LGBT rights and the role of government in defining personal relationships.
Contention
There are notable points of contention regarding HJR77, particularly surrounding issues of morality, religious beliefs, and the interpretation of constitutional rights. Opponents often leverage arguments rooted in traditional definitions of marriage, expressing fears that recognizing same-sex marriages could undermine societal norms. Moreover, the potential implications of this amendment extend beyond marriage itself, potentially influencing discussions on family rights, adoption, and other familial legal statuses. This tension highlights the complex interplay between evolving social attitudes and established legal frameworks.
Enabled by
Relating to authorizing a marriage between two persons of the same sex in this state and repealing the statutory prohibition against the recognition of a civil union or similar relationship entered into in another state between two persons of the same sex.
Identical
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Relating to the prohibition of face covering mandates by this state and political subdivisions of this state in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; providing exceptions.
Relating to certain statutory changes to reflect and address same-sex marriages and parenting relationships and to the removal of provisions regarding the criminality or unacceptability of homosexual conduct.
Relating to certain statutory changes to reflect and address same-sex marriages and parenting relationships and to the removal of provisions regarding the criminality or unacceptability of homosexual conduct.
Relating to the identification of constitutional or statutory provisions of this state that have been invalidated or otherwise limited by a state appellate court.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision that prohibits the appropriation of state money or property for the benefit of any sect, religious society, or theological or religious seminary.