Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1671

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the designation of certain synthetic cannabinoids as controlled substances and controlled substance analogues under the Texas Controlled Substances Act.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1671 will have significant implications for drug enforcement strategy in Texas. By adding synthetic cannabinoids to the list of controlled substances, law enforcement agencies will have more authority to address offenses related to these substances. This change is designed to enhance the enforcement capabilities against synthetic cannabinoids that have been associated with various health risks and public safety concerns. The bill's effectiveness will be contingent on proper enforcement and public awareness campaigns to educate the community about the dangers associated with these substances.

Summary

House Bill 1671 aims to address the regulation of synthetic cannabinoids in Texas by designating certain synthetic compounds as controlled substances under the Texas Controlled Substances Act. The bill specifically modifies the definitions and classifications of controlled substances, particularly in relation to synthetic cannabinoids, thereby expanding the scope of substances that can be monitored and regulated. By implementing stricter control measures, this legislation is intended to combat the growing availability and use of synthetic cannabinoids that mimic the effects of natural cannabinoids.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1671 is largely positive among lawmakers and public health advocates who view it as a necessary response to an increasing public health threat. Proponents argue that the regulation of synthetic cannabinoids will protect communities, especially youth, from substances that can lead to dangerous side effects and addiction. However, some concerns were raised regarding the potential for overreach and the impact on legitimate medicinal use of cannabis products, as the distinctions between synthetic and natural cannabinoids can be intricate and sometimes blurred.

Contention

A notable point of contention in discussions around HB 1671 relates to the classification of certain synthetic cannabinoids and the implications for companies that research and develop cannabis-related products. While proponents emphasize public health and safety, critics express worries about the potential impact on scientific research and the legitimate market for cannabis. The need for clear definitions and guidelines becomes crucial as Texas navigates the growing complexities surrounding cannabis regulation, and the discourse reflects a broader national debate on the appropriate balance between regulation and access.

Companion Bills

TX SB263

Identical Relating to the designation for criminal prosecution and other purposes of certain chemicals commonly referred to as synthetic cannabinoids as controlled substances and controlled substance analogues under the Texas Controlled Substances Act.

Previously Filed As

TX HB218

Relating to the criminal and licensing consequences of certain offenses relating to the possession of marihuana, certain tetrahydrocannabinols, certain synthetic cannabinoids, and drug paraphernalia; imposing a fee.

TX HB3620

Relating to repealing certain offenses and removing certain regulations relating to marihuana, cannabis, cannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoids, and paraphernalia.

TX SB967

Relating to the criminal and licensing consequences of certain offenses relating to the possession of marihuana, certain tetrahydrocannabinols, certain synthetic cannabinoids, and drug paraphernalia; imposing a fee.

TX HB520

Relating to criminal penalties for possession offenses under the Texas Controlled Substances Act.

TX HB224

Relating to removing criminal penalties for the possession or distribution of certain drug paraphernalia under the Texas Controlled Substances Act.

TX SB645

Relating to the designation of fentanyl poisoning for purposes of the death certificate and to the criminal penalties for certain controlled substance offenses; increasing a criminal penalty.

TX HB939

Relating to the penalty for certain offenders for possession of a small amount of certain controlled substances.

TX HB178

Relating to testing possible controlled substance evidence for a controlled substance included in Penalty Group 1-B.

TX HB6

Relating to the designation of fentanyl poisoning or fentanyl toxicity for purposes of the death certificate and to the criminal penalties for certain controlled substance offenses; increasing a criminal penalty.

TX HB3644

Relating to the offense of murder committed by the manufacture or delivery of certain controlled substances.

Similar Bills

TX SB263

Relating to the designation for criminal prosecution and other purposes of certain chemicals commonly referred to as synthetic cannabinoids as controlled substances and controlled substance analogues under the Texas Controlled Substances Act.

OK SB860

Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act; adding certain substance to Schedule I. Effective date.

OK SB452

Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act; including certain chemicals in the list of Schedule I substances. Effective date.

OK SB452

Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act; including certain chemicals in the list of Schedule I substances. Effective date.

OK SB1152

Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act; modifying inclusions. Effective date.

OK HB1311

Controlled dangerous substances; adding chemicals to Schedule I; effective date.

OK SB1216

Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act; adding substances to list of Schedule I controlled substances. Effective date.