Proposing a constitutional amendment relating to the determination of a quorum of the senate or house of representatives.
If enacted, HJR122 would amend Section 10, Article III of the Texas Constitution. It would fundamentally alter how quorums are determined, potentially allowing legislative sessions to proceed even when a significant number of members are not present but are simply absent from the state. This could lead to more efficient legislative sessions, especially during times of crisis when members might be unable to attend due to emergencies or exigent circumstances.
HJR122 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment aimed at redefining the determination of a quorum for the Texas Senate and House of Representatives. The amendment suggests that members who are absent from the state should be excluded from the count of those needed to constitute a quorum necessary for conducting legislative business. This change intends to facilitate the legislative process by allowing a smaller number of members to conduct business, provided they are not affected by absences due to being out of state.
The sentiment surrounding HJR122 appears to favor a more streamlined legislative process, allowing quicker decision-making in the Senate and House. Supporters may argue that this change brings flexibility, enabling legislative bodies to function effectively, whereas critics might raise concerns about the implications for representative democracy, positing that it could lead to decisions being made without adequate representation or debate from all elected officials.
Notable points of contention include the potential risks associated with allowing smaller groups of legislators to make decisions on critical issues without the full representation of their peers. Opponents may argue that this amendment might undermine the very essence of a quorum, which is designed to ensure broad representation and accountability. The proposed change could spark debates about the balance between legislative efficiency and comprehensive representation, highlighting the tensions inherent in legislative governance.