Texas House Bill HCR77

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Reaffirming Texas' sovereignty under the Texas Constitution and the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Impact

The resolution points out grievances related to unfunded mandates imposed by the federal government, claiming that these actions violate the Tenth Amendment. It argues that the federal government has not adequately protected Texas borders and has engaged in reckless financial policies that threaten the state's economic stability. This sentiment underlines a call for Texas to reclaim more power over its governance and decision-making processes, reinforcing the state's position against perceived federal encroachment.

Summary

HCR77 is a concurrent resolution that reaffirms Texas' sovereignty under both the Texas Constitution and the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The resolution reflects a historical context, noting Texas's time as an independent republic before joining the Union, emphasizing that it remains a free and independent state governed primarily by its own constitution. The underlying message expresses a concern over federal overreach and the implications this has on local governance in Texas, calling for greater autonomy.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR77 is largely supportive among those who advocate for greater state sovereignty and decentralized government. Proponents view it as a necessary statement that defends the rights of Texans against federal regulations and expenditures that they feel are unjustified. However, this perspective is countered by concerns from opponents who may perceive such resolutions as divisive or a misinterpretation of federal roles in state matters.

Contention

Notably, the resolution serves as a formal request to the U.S. Congress to recognize Texas's assertions of sovereignty and to ensure that such principles are acknowledged at the federal level. The contention lies not only in the recognition of Texas's historical independence but also in the broader debate over the balance of power between state and federal governments. This issue encapsulates ongoing tensions in American politics regarding self-governance and local authority versus federal oversight.