Proposing a constitutional amendment to provide for review or approval of state agency rules by the elected members of the legislature.
Impact
If enacted, SJR9 would add a new section to Article II of the Texas Constitution. It would allow the legislature to create general laws that detail the procedures for the review or approval of agency rules. This could include mechanisms to suspend, repeal, or set expiration conditions for these rules, hence granting the legislature greater control and authority over administrative regulations. The implications of this shift could include a change in how quickly and efficiently state agencies can implement new rules, depending on legislative approval timelines.
Summary
SJR9, a joint resolution proposed in the Texas Legislature, seeks to amend the Texas Constitution to establish a framework for legislative review and approval of rules set by state agencies. This proposed amendment aims to empower elected legislators to have a direct say in the regulations that agencies within the executive branch can implement. By requiring legislative approval, the bill could significantly increase the oversight the legislature has over bureaucratic rule-making processes, thereby enhancing checks and balances within state governance.
Contention
While the supporters of SJR9 argue that it will enhance legislative control and accountability over state agencies, potential opposition may arise concerning the balance of power. Critics could assert that increasing legislative oversight might slow down critical regulatory processes or lead to political influence in areas that typically rely on expert agency decision-making. There may also be concerns about whether this process might hinder agencies' abilities to respond swiftly to emerging issues and public needs, as every rule could require legislative approval before taking effect, creating potential bottlenecks.
Additional_notes
The resolution proposes that only elected members of the legislature participate in the review or approval process, which emphasizes the democratic foundation of the amendment. Voters will ultimately cast their decision on this constitutional change in an election scheduled for November 3, 2015, allowing citizens to weigh in on the proposed oversight of bureaucratic regulations.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the time that a person may serve as a member of the Texas Legislature or as a statewide elected officer in the executive branch.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the time that a person may serve as a member of the Texas Legislature or as a statewide elected officer in the executive branch to 12 consecutive years.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to set the salaries of members of the legislature and the lieutenant governor based on the average public school teacher salary in this state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to require that future constitutional amendments become effective only if approved by a majority of the voters in at least three-fourths of the counties of the state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing legislative action at any time during a regular session of the legislature on a bill that extends the existence of an agency, commission, or advisory committee following legislative review.