Texas House Bill HB1385

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to local option elections to legalize or prohibit the operation of eight-liners; providing penalties; imposing fees.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1385 is significant as it provides a structured framework for determining the legality of eight-liners across different political subdivisions in Texas. By enabling local option elections, the bill is expected to empower communities by allowing them to tailor gambling regulations to their specific social and economic needs. This could result in varying laws across the state, with some areas choosing to legalize eight-liners while others may opt for prohibition, thus creating a patchwork of regulations that reflects local sentiment.

Summary

House Bill 1385 pertains to the regulation of eight-liners, electronic devices that simulate traditional mechanical slot machines. The bill introduces provisions for local option elections, allowing voters in specific political subdivisions to decide whether to legalize or prohibit the operation of these devices. It outlines the mechanisms for calling an election, required petition processes, and the timelines for holding such elections, ensuring that communities have a say in the legality of eight-liner operations in their areas. The law will amend the Election Code to include detailed procedures for these elections, particularly involving the responsibilities of county officials in conducting and certifying election results.

Contention

Despite its potential benefits, the bill may face contention regarding its impact on local governance and the socio-economic implications of legalizing eight-liners. Proponents argue that the bill supports local control and provides a mechanism for communities to benefit economically from regulated gambling activities, which could boost local revenue and tourism. Conversely, opponents may express concerns regarding the potential for increased gambling-related issues, social consequences, and the risk of exploitation through these devices. Additionally, the collection of fees associated with operating these devices could be seen as a way to profit from gambling at the expense of vulnerable populations.