Texas Senate Bill SB1093

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to credit to certain ceding insurers for reinsurance ceded to certain assuming insurers.

Impact

The impact of SB1093 on Texas state laws will primarily be felt within the insurance industry, particularly among those entities engaged in reinsurance agreements. By delineating clear provisions regarding the custody and type of funds that can be regarded as security, the bill is set to reinforce the financial stability of ceding insurers while potentially attracting more business to Texas from assuming insurers. This amendment can lead to more stringent compliance requirements but is designed to bolster consumer confidence in the insurance market.

Summary

SB1093 aims to amend sections of the Texas Insurance Code relating to the credit that certain ceding insurers can obtain for reinsurance ceded to certain assuming insurers. The bill specifically alters the requirements for funds held as security, clarifying that these funds need to be maintained in the United States and exclusively controlled by the ceding insurer. This change intends to enhance the security and reliability of the insurance transactions involved in reinsurance practices and is expected to fortify the financial framework within which these companies operate.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1093 was predominantly positive, particularly among insurance industry stakeholders who viewed the bill as a progressive step towards ensuring robust financial practices in reinsurance. Proponents underscored its potential to foster a safer regulatory environment, thus enhancing the state's appeal for reinsurance operations. However, some caution was expressed regarding the increased regulatory burden on smaller firms, which may find it challenging to meet the new requirements without significant restructuring.

Contention

Notable points of contention during the discussions revolved around the balance between ensuring financial security and imposing regulatory pressures on insurers. Critics raised concerns that while enhancing security is important, overly stringent restrictions could limit flexibility for smaller insurers and impact competition. The debate highlighted the importance of adjusting regulations in a way that safeguards the interests of consumers while still supporting a competitive insurance market.