Relating to advance directives and health care and treatment decisions.
Impact
The legislation establishes protocols that healthcare facilities must follow when handling requests related to life-sustaining treatments and ensures patients receive notifications about their rights. In cases where an attending physician disagrees with a patient's or surrogate's decision to withdraw treatment, the case will undergo a review by an ethics or medical committee. This process is designed to ensure that decisions are medically appropriate while preserving patient autonomy and rights.
Summary
House Bill 4100 seeks to make important amendments to the existing framework governing advance directives and the decisions surrounding healthcare treatments for patients, particularly in the context of end-of-life care. It aims to clarify the definitions of key terms, such as 'life-sustaining treatment' and 'artificially administered nutrition and hydration'. Additionally, the bill introduces procedures for handling do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders and enhances the rights of patients or their surrogates regarding healthcare treatment decisions.
Contention
Some notable points of contention surrounding HB 4100 include concerns about the balance between a physician's medical judgement and a patient's right to refuse life-sustaining treatment. Critics argue that the ethics committee process may lead to delays in the execution of advance directives as patients continue to receive life-sustaining treatment during ongoing reviews. Proponents, however, argue that this mechanism is necessary to prevent premature withdrawal of treatment in complex cases where medical ethics must be carefully navigated.
Relating to advance directives and health care treatment decisions made by or on behalf of patients, including a review of those directives and decisions.
Relating to advance directives and health care treatment decisions made by or on behalf of patients, including a review of those directives and decisions.
Relating to advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders, and health care treatment decisions made by or on behalf of certain patients, including a review of directives and decisions.
Relating to health care practitioner authority regarding certain do-not-resuscitate orders, including the use of electronic copies and photographs of out-of-hospital do-not-resuscitate orders.
Relating to prohibitions on the provision to certain children of procedures and treatments for gender transitioning, gender reassignment, or gender dysphoria and on the use of public money or public assistance to provide those procedures and treatments.
Relating to advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders, and health care treatment decisions made by or on behalf of certain patients, including a review of directives and decisions.
Relating to advance directives and health care treatment decisions made by or on behalf of patients, including a review of those directives and decisions.