Texas House Bill HB391

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

• Filed: 11/17/16

Caption

Relating to the carrying of handguns on the campuses of and certain other locations associated with institutions of higher education.

Impact

The implications of HB 391 are significant as it gives universities and colleges the ability to create rules regarding handgun possession, thus enabling them to tailor their security measures to their unique environments. By allowing institutions to consult with their communities, the bill aims to foster a sense of shared responsibility for campus safety while potentially improving the comfort and security of students and staff who may feel threatened by firearms on campus. However, this authority may lead to variations in handgun policies across different educational institutions, which could create confusion among license holders.

Summary

House Bill 391 concerns the carrying of handguns on the campuses of institutions of higher education in Texas. The bill amends existing laws, particularly Section 411.2031 of the Government Code, providing that institutions may establish regulations prohibiting license holders from carrying handguns on their campuses and associated locations. This grant of authority is contingent on the institutions consulting with students, staff, and faculty regarding these provisions. The bill aims to balance individual rights to carry firearms with campus safety protocols by allowing institutions to adopt their own regulatory frameworks.

Contention

Opposition to this bill centers around concerns regarding the potential for increased gun violence on campuses, with critics arguing that the presence of firearms could escalate conflicts and pose increased risks to student safety. Proponents, however, contend that responsible firearm owners should have the right to protect themselves, asserting that the legislation does not mandate gun carrying but rather permits institutions to allow it or not. Additionally, the bill introduces provisions that prior legal immunities for institutions will remain unless they adopt the new regulations, sparking debate on the responsibility of higher education institutions for incidents occurring on their property.