Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to intellectual disability and certain references to abolished health and human services agencies.
The implementation of HB 446 is expected to have a significant impact on how statutes are interpreted and enforced, particularly concerning individuals with intellectual disabilities. By removing outdated terminology, the bill not only aims to reduce stigma associated with disabilities but also to ensure that state laws align with contemporary practices and perceptions. This change is likely to influence how state agencies interact with individuals with intellectual disabilities and could result in broader calls for inclusivity across various sectors of public policy and service delivery.
House Bill 446 aims to modernize and refine the terminology used within Texas statutes regarding individuals with intellectual disabilities. Specifically, the bill replaces the outdated and derogatory term 'mental retardation' with 'intellectual disability' throughout Texas legislation. The intent is to remove language that many consider offensive and to reflect current understanding and respect for individuals with intellectual disabilities. This change aligns with broader societal views advocating for the dignity and proper representation of all individuals, especially in legal contexts.
The sentiment surrounding HB 446 is largely positive, with support coming from various advocacy groups, individuals, and legislators who emphasize the importance of using respectful language. Testimonies presented during discussions highlight the belief that language carries power, and changing these terms is a crucial step towards acknowledging the dignity of individuals with intellectual disabilities. While there may be some individuals or entities resistant to changes in legal language, overall, the momentum appears to support the bill’s passage and its objectives.
Notable points of contention include discussions about the pace of change in language use within legal statutes and the necessity of such legislation. Some stakeholders argue that legislative measures may not be the most effective way to change societal views about disabilities, suggesting that education and community awareness may need to accompany legal reforms. However, the consensus among most proponents is that legislative action like HB 446 provides a foundational step in fostering respect and equality for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Civil Practice And Remedies Code
Code Of Criminal Procedure
Government Code
Health And Safety Code
Human Resources Code
Insurance Code
Labor Code
Local Government Code
Transportation Code
Tax Code
Finance Code
Family Code