Texas House Bill HB796

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the work-study student mentorship program administered by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.

Impact

In terms of state laws, this bill would amend sections of the Education Code related to the administration of the work-study program. By revising the conditions and expanding the scope of the mentorship initiative, the bill aims to increase student engagement through mentorship roles that contribute to both their own success and that of their peers. It sets a framework for collaboration between institutions of higher education, school districts, and nonprofit organizations to create a supportive educational environment that focuses on student retention and completion rates.

Summary

House Bill 796 aims to enhance the work-study student mentorship program administered by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. The bill modifies provisions regarding the eligibility criteria and the roles of both students and participating entities in the program. Specifically, it expands the program to include opportunities for mentoring and counseling high school students, in addition to supporting student interventions at institutions of higher education. This is intended to foster greater access to and success in higher education for students within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 796 appears to be positive, particularly among educational stakeholders who advocate for increased mentorship opportunities. Supporters argue that the bill provides vital support structures for students, particularly those who are struggling academically. There is a recognition that mentorship can significantly impact student success, and the expansion of this program is viewed as a strategic enhancement to educational outcomes within Texas. However, the conversation may include caution regarding resource allocation and the practical implementation of the mentoring relationships.

Contention

A potential point of contention surrounding the bill relates to the matching funds requirement imposed on participating institutions. While the intention is to ensure collaborative investment in mentorship programs, there may be concerns about the financial burden on educational entities, particularly those with limited resources. Additionally, some may debate the effectiveness of mentorship as a solution to academic challenges, raising questions about the program's design and execution. Nevertheless, the overall objective of promoting education access and success through structured mentorship is a central motivating factor for this legislation.