Relating to the confidentiality of certain home address information in ad valorem tax appraisal records.
The implementation of SB510 is expected to result in significant changes to the Texas Tax Code, specifically regarding how personal data is handled and disclosed in the context of property tax records. This change would provide additional security for those listed in the bill, making it more challenging for individuals to access sensitive information that could potentially be misused. The act reinforces the state's commitment to protect the privacy of individuals, particularly those at risk due to their occupations or family circumstances.
SB510 focuses on enhancing the confidentiality of certain home address information within ad valorem tax appraisal records. The legislation seeks to protect the personal information of specific individuals, including current and former peace officers, jailers, victims of family violence, and certain judicial employees. By limiting access to these details, the bill aims to safeguard the privacy of individuals in vulnerable positions who may face threats or dangers due to their professions or experiences.
The sentiment surrounding SB510 appears to be largely positive, with strong support among legislators and advocacy groups interested in victim protection and law enforcement. Proponents argue that the confidentiality provided by this bill is essential for the safety of individuals whose personal information could otherwise be made public, potentially putting them at risk. Opponents, if any, have not prominently flagged the bill, indicating a broad consensus on the necessity of maintaining confidentiality for certain personal information.
Notable points of contention are limited, as the bill emphasizes protecting individuals who are already at risk. The measure is primarily defensive in nature, targeting the preservation of personal safety rather than imposing new regulations or limitations on broader populations. Although specific resistance did not surface during its introduction or voting phases, future discussions may consider the balance between public records transparency and the privacy needs of certain individuals, especially in contexts involving tax data. The unanimous support (144 yeas and 0 nays) on voting day underscores the bill’s acceptance across party lines.