Relating to the franchise and insurance premium tax credit for the certified rehabilitation of certified historic structures.
The main outcome of SB 1013 will be the improved process for claiming tax credits associated with the rehabilitation of certified historic structures. By reorganizing where this credit is found in the Tax Code, it aims to encourage more property owners to restore rather than demolish historic buildings. This could potentially lead to revitalization in certain areas, spurring adjacent economic growth and preserving local heritage. Operating under the new Chapter 172, the process will also delineate clearer qualification guidelines for interested entities, fostering a more direct relationship with state tax authorities as they seek credits for eligible expenses.
Senate Bill 1013, introduced by Senator Hughes, pertains to the franchise and insurance premium tax credit aimed at promoting the certified rehabilitation of historic structures in Texas. This bill facilitates the transfer of the historic tax credit from Chapter 171 to Chapter 172 of the Tax Code. It seeks to expand the utilization of existing tax incentives by simplifying the regulatory framework for entities engaged in the rehabilitation of historically significant buildings. The tax credit remains set at 25% of eligible rehabilitation costs, which was originally established in previous legislation from 2013.
Overall sentiment towards SB 1013 appears to be favorable, as there seems to be a consensus among legislative members on the importance of historical preservation for community development and economic enhancement. Various stakeholders, including local government representatives and historical advocacy groups, have expressed support, emphasizing the relevance of preserving the state's cultural heritage. The unanimous votes during the bill's progression through the legislature suggest a strong bipartisan agreement on the need for such measures.
While there was broad support for SB 1013, concerns about local impacts have been raised. Some legislators expressed the need to ensure that the interests of local communities are adequately accounted for, especially in areas where historical redevelopment might significantly alter local landscapes. The potential for misunderstandings regarding the local tax implications of the bill was noted, indicating a necessity for further dialogue between state representatives and local officials on how these credits would be implemented in varying contexts. Nonetheless, the bill did not face significant opposition during discussions.