Massachusetts House Bill H4186

Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/15/23
• Engrossed: 11/15/23
• Engrossed: 4/4/24
• Refer: 4/8/24
• Chaptered: 5/3/24
• Passed: 5/3/24

Caption

Authorizing the town of Mashpee to convey certain town owned conservation land to Jacques and Rosalie Fresco

Impact

This legislation would effectively legalize the exchange of conservation land in a manner that aligns with the provisions set forth in Section 8C of Chapter 40 of the General Laws and Article 97 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution. The intent is to ensure that any acquired land will also be preserved for open space, conservation, and passive recreation, reflecting the community's commitment to environmental stewardship. The passage of H4186 would represent a significant shift in the management of local conservation efforts, enabling Mashpee to manage its land resources more flexibly.

Summary

House Bill 4186 seeks to authorize the town of Mashpee to convey certain town-owned conservation land to Jacques and Rosalie Fresco. The bill specifically allows the select board and conservation commission of Mashpee to transfer a designated portion of land, which is approximately 2,940 square feet, in exchange for acquiring another parcel of land for open space and conservation purposes. This transaction is intended to enhance the community's ability to provide recreational spaces while adhering to existing regulations concerning the use of conservation land in Massachusetts.

Contention

While the bill encountered no recorded opposition, it is important to note that discussions around similar measures often involve concerns regarding the conservation of public lands. Opponents of land conveyance bills typically argue about the potential for loss of protected areas and the implications for local ecosystems. In this case, however, the provisions within H4186 explicitly maintain assurances that the land transferred will only be used for conservation and passive recreation, addressing common arguments against such legislation. The focus remains on balancing community needs with environmental protections.