Massachusetts 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H437 Introduced / Bill

Filed 02/16/2023

                    1 of 2
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1915       FILED ON: 1/18/2023
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 437
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Antonio F. D. Cabral
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act relative to the training, assessment, and assignment of qualified school interpreters in 
educational settings.
_______________
PETITION OF:
NAME:DISTRICT/ADDRESS :DATE ADDED:Antonio F. D. Cabral13th Bristol1/18/2023Carmine Lawrence Gentile13th Middlesex1/25/2023Christopher Hendricks11th Bristol1/26/2023James K. Hawkins2nd Bristol1/27/2023Peter Capano11th Essex1/30/2023Carol A. Doherty3rd Bristol1/30/2023Vanna Howard17th Middlesex1/30/2023Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr.12th Hampden1/31/2023Lindsay N. Sabadosa1st Hampshire1/31/2023Paul A. Schmid, III8th Bristol2/1/2023Steven Owens29th Middlesex2/6/2023Jason M. LewisFifth Middlesex2/6/2023Bud L. Williams11th Hampden2/6/2023Adrian C. Madaro1st Suffolk2/6/2023Samantha Montaño15th Suffolk2/6/2023Jon Santiago9th Suffolk2/6/2023Tram T. Nguyen18th Essex2/7/2023 2 of 2
Andres X. Vargas3rd Essex2/8/2023Frank A. Moran17th Essex2/8/2023Carlos González10th Hampden2/8/2023Jessica Ann Giannino16th Suffolk2/9/2023Christine P. Barber34th Middlesex2/9/2023Patricia A. Duffy5th Hampden2/9/2023Jennifer Balinsky Armini8th Essex2/10/2023James B. EldridgeMiddlesex and Worcester2/15/2023Patricia A. Haddad5th Bristol2/23/2023Rebecca L. RauschNorfolk, Worcester and Middlesex2/23/2023Joanne M. ComerfordHampshire, Franklin and Worcester2/24/2023 1 of 4
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1915       FILED ON: 1/18/2023
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 437
By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 437) of 
Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to the training, assessment, and assignment of qualified 
school interpreters in educational settings. Education.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-Third General Court
(2023-2024)
_______________
An Act relative to the training, assessment, and assignment of qualified school interpreters in 
educational settings.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority 
of the same, as follows:
1 SECTION 1. Chapter 69 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition, 
2is hereby amended by inserting the following section: 
3 Section 37. Training, assessment, and assignment of qualified school interpreters in 
4educational settings 
5 (1) The following words, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, shall have the 
6following meanings: 
7 “Department” the department of elementary and secondary education 
8 “Person with Limited English Proficiency (Person with LEP)” an individual who has a 
9limited ability to read, write, speak or understand English because the person uses primarily a 
10language other than English. This includes parents or guardians of minor children with LEP, 
11regardless of the children’s LEP status.  2 of 4
12 “Interpretation” the immediate oral rendering of an utterance from a source language into 
13a target language 
14 “Interpreter” a person who has demonstrated language proficiency in English and at least 
15one other language and is readily able to interpret spoken language from English to the target 
16language and from the target language to English, and who also has knowledge and 
17understanding of the pertinent subject matter to be translated, the role of the interpreter in school 
18settings, and ethics and confidentiality with respect to interpretation. 
19 “Parent” a natural, adoptive, or foster parent of a child, a guardian, or an individual acting 
20in the place of a natural or adoptive parent (including a grandparent, stepparent, or other relative) 
21with whom the child lives, or an individual who is legally responsible for the child’s welfare. 
22 “Specialized meeting” a meeting requiring a high level of interpretation skills including 
23but not limited to discussion regarding: an Individualized Education Program (IEP); a safety plan 
24or behavioral intervention plan (BIP); matters regarding school discipline; matters regarding 
25special education due process; placement in an English Learner Education (ELE) program; 
26development of or changes to an Individual 504 plan; addressing bullying complaints; or the use 
27of physical restraint or seclusion of students; 
28 “Standard meeting” is a parent conference, community meeting, or other school 
29gatherings that does not have legal context. 
30 “Tier 1 Interpreter” an interpreter whose language proficiency need not be formally 
31assessed.  3 of 4
32 “Tier 2 Interpreter” an interpreter who, after a formal assessment process to be 
33determined by the department, demonstrates an understanding of basic educational terminology 
34used in school settings, participates in ongoing professional development in interpreting, and 
35exhibits tier-2 competency pursuant to subsection 2 of this section and department regulations. 
36 “Tier 3 Interpreter” an interpreter who, after a formal assessment process to be 
37determined by the department, understands specialized educational terminology used in school 
38settings, participates in ongoing professional development in interpreting, and exhibits tier-3 
39competency pursuant to subsection 2 of this section and department regulations. 
40 (2) Consistent with the recommendations of the School Interpreters Task Force, as 
41authorized by Section 81 of Chapter 154 of the Acts of 2018, the department shall: 
42 (A)develop and administer a system for training, assessing, and determining 
43qualifications of interpreters in educational settings with assurance that tier 3 interpreters shall be 
44used for all specialized meetings, tier 2 or 3 interpreters may be used for all standard meetings 
45and Tier 1 interpreters may be used during spontaneous, unannounced meetings or 
46communication scenarios that occur in schools when a tier 3 or 2 interpreter is not available. 
47 (B)develop and make available an educational course of sufficient duration that includes 
48coursework and field experience to support development of the key competencies and knowledge 
49required of interpreters in schools; and 
50 (C)create a publicly accessible mechanism to identify tier-3 interpreters for scheduled 
51specialized meetings.  4 of 4
52 (3) The department shall adopt regulations necessary to administer a system for training, 
53assessing, and determining qualifications of interpreters in school settings to improve access for 
54parents with LEP. Said regulations shall be consistent with the recommendations of the School 
55Interpreters Task Force, as authorized by Section 81 of Chapter 154 of the Acts of 2018, and 
56shall include but not be limited to: 
57 (A) a process for assessing the language proficiency of interpreters seeking to interpret in 
58school settings, including required levels of competency necessary to obtain tier-2 and tier-3 
59interpreting status, with grandfathering allowed for school employees whose primary job 
60responsibility has been to serve as an interpreter for one or more years. 
61 (B) required hours of supervised field experience for tier-3 interpreters. 
62 (C) procedures for implementation of the publicly accessible mechanism created pursuant 
63to subsection 1 of this section to identify and secure tier-3 interpreters for scheduled specialized 
64meetings. 
65 SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon its passage, provided that the department 
66may administer a phased implementation of the provisions of subsection 2 of this act to a diverse 
67number of school districts, 	subject to appropriation, and provided further that final 
68implementation of all sections of this act shall take effect statewide when certified as appropriate 
69by the commissioner of elementary and secondary education in a report to the general court.  
70 
71