Massachusetts House Bill H4915

Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/25/24
• Engrossed: 7/25/24
• Engrossed: 7/31/24
• Enrolled: 7/31/24
• Chaptered: 8/8/24
• Passed: 8/8/24

Caption

Relative to the use of elephants, big cats, primates, giraffes and bears in traveling exhibits and shows

Impact

If enacted, HB 4915 would significantly impact how animal performances are conducted in traveling settings, effectively curtailing certain entertainment practices that involve wildlife. The amendment addresses concerns raised by animal rights advocates regarding the treatment of wild animals in mobile exhibits. By limiting performances to those where animals are housed permanently at non-mobile facilities, the legislation could lead to a decline in such exhibitions and a shift towards more humane treatment and presentation of animals. The bill is set to take effect on January 1, 2025, providing time for stakeholders to adapt to the new regulations.

Summary

House Bill 4915 seeks to regulate the use of certain animals including elephants, big cats, primates, giraffes, and bears in traveling exhibits and shows in Massachusetts. The bill introduces a new section to Chapter 131 of the General Laws, which prohibits the participation of 'covered animals' in traveling animal acts unless they are housed permanently at a fixed facility. This regulation aims to prioritize the welfare of these animals and restrict their involvement in performances that may be detrimental to their health and well-being. Any violations of this provision would result in significant civil penalties ranging from $500 to $10,000 per animal involved.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB 4915 highlight a broader debate over the ethics of using wild animals for entertainment. Proponents argue that this law is a necessary step towards improving animal welfare and aligns with the growing public sentiment against the exploitation of animals in the entertainment industry. On the other hand, critics, including some members of the entertainment sector, may express concerns about the economic implications of such restrictions and the potential loss of revenue from traveling exhibitions that feature animal performances. This tension reflects a fundamental challenge in balancing animal rights with economic interests in the state.