Massachusetts Senate Bill S2149

Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23

Caption

Relative to fair and stable utility pricing

Impact

The bill aims to create a more manageable and stable pricing environment for electricity users in Massachusetts, potentially decreasing customer dissatisfaction related to sudden or disproportionate rate increases. It establishes a structured process for rate changes, requiring electric companies to notify the regulatory department 60 days in advance and conduct public hearings for any proposed rate increases. This could enhance transparency and accountability in the utility sector, allowing consumers to have their voices heard regarding significant pricing adjustments.

Summary

Bill S2149, titled 'An Act relative to fair and stable utility pricing,' was introduced in the Massachusetts General Court by legislators Paul W. Mark and Jonathan D. Zlotnik. The bill proposes an amendment to Chapter 164 of the General Laws concerning the regulation of utility rates, particularly electricity pricing. One of the key components of this bill is the introduction of an inflation cap on the average rates for electric customers starting March 1, 2024. This cap will not exceed the annual growth rate of the Consumer Price Index, ensuring that electricity prices do not inflate uncontrollably and providing some level of financial predictability for consumers.

Contention

Despite the bill's consumer-friendly goals, there may be points of contention regarding its implications for utility companies and the broader regulatory environment. Critics might argue that imposing an inflation cap could hinder a utility company's ability to adjust rates in response to rising operational costs. Furthermore, the requirement for public hearings may slow down the process of implementing necessary changes to rates, which could have implications for the financial health of utility providers. Thus, while the bill emphasizes consumer protection, stakeholders within the utility industry might view it as imposing excessive regulatory burdens.