Massachusetts 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H1934 Introduced / Bill

Filed 02/27/2025

                    1 of 2
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2591       FILED ON: 1/16/2025
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1934
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Edward R. Philips
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act preventing animal cruelty.
_______________
PETITION OF:
NAME:DISTRICT/ADDRESS :DATE ADDED:Edward R. Philips8th Norfolk1/16/2025Jacob R. OliveiraHampden, Hampshire and Worcester2/10/2025Samantha Montaño15th Suffolk2/5/2025Christine P. Barber34th Middlesex2/24/2025Marjorie C. Decker25th Middlesex2/17/2025Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr.12th Hampden1/24/2025Lindsay N. Sabadosa1st Hampshire1/31/2025Brian W. Murray10th Worcester1/31/2025Michael D. BradySecond Plymouth and Norfolk2/10/2025Mike Connolly26th Middlesex2/10/2025James K. Hawkins2nd Bristol2/10/2025Tara T. Hong18th Middlesex2/10/2025Manny Cruz7th Essex2/10/2025Brian M. Ashe2nd Hampden2/10/2025Vanna Howard17th Middlesex2/17/2025James Arciero2nd Middlesex3/4/2025Patrick Joseph Kearney4th Plymouth3/4/2025David Henry Argosky LeBoeuf17th Worcester3/4/2025 2 of 2
William C. Galvin6th Norfolk3/4/2025Bruce E. TarrFirst Essex and Middlesex3/4/2025Joseph W. McGonagle, Jr.28th Middlesex3/4/2025James C. Arena-DeRosa8th Middlesex3/4/2025 1 of 6
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 2591       FILED ON: 1/16/2025
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1934
By Representative Philips of Sharon, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1934) of 
Edward R. Philips and others for legislation to further regulate animal cruelty. The Judiciary.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-Fourth General Court
(2025-2026)
_______________
An Act preventing animal cruelty.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority 
of the same, as follows:
1 SECTION 1.
2 Chapter 140 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2022 Official Edition, is hereby 
3amended by inserting after section 151C the following section:-.
4 Section 151D. 
5 (1) For the purposes of this section:
6 (a) “Enforcing Authority” shall include: any law enforcement officer, animal control 
7officer certified under section 151 of chapter 140, special state police officer duly appointed by 
8the colonel of the state police at the request of the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of 
9Cruelty to Animals or the Animal Rescue League of Boston under section 57 of chapter 22C, 
10sheriff or deputy sheriff; and
11 (b) “Neglected” shall include, but not be limited to the following: 2 of 6
12 (i) depriving the animal of necessary sustenance; 
13 (ii) failing to provide the animal with proper food, drink, shelter, sanitary environment, or 
14protection from the weather; or
15 (iii) allowing or permitting the animal to be subjected to unnecessary suffering.
16 (2) To humanely protect any neglected animal, the enforcing authority may, upon 
17probable cause to believe an animal has been neglected:
18 (a) Immediately remove an animal in an emergency situation from the animal’s present 
19location in order to take custody of the animal if the enforcing authority has an objectively 
20reasonable basis to believe that the animal is injured or in imminent danger of physical harm, 
21provided the enforcing authority’s conduct following entry for removal is reasonable under the 
22circumstances. A petition pursuant to this section shall be filed with the district court of the 
23county in which the animal is located within 10 calendar days of removal of the animal seeking 
24relief under this section; 
25 (b) File a petition with the district court of the county in which the animal is located 
26seeking authority to order the owner or keeper of any animal found neglected to provide certain 
27care to such animal at the expense of the owner or keeper without removal of the animal from its 
28present location; or
29 (c) File a petition with the district court of the county in which the animal is located 
30seeking authority to seize the animal.
31 (3) Upon the filing of a petition pursuant to this section, wherein the enforcing authority 
32is seeking relief pursuant to this section, the clerk magistrate of the district court shall schedule  3 of 6
33and commence a hearing on the petition before the justice of the district court within 10 calendar 
34days of the date the petition is filed to determine whether the animal is neglected and whether the 
35owner or keeper, if known, is able to humanely care for the animal. If there is any period of delay 
36beyond the initial 10 calendar days before a hearing can commence, and that delay is attributable 
37to the enforcing authority, the owner or keeper shall not be required to cover the cost of animal 
38care for such period of delay. After the hearing, the court order shall be entered within 10 
39calendar days. A fee may not be charged for filing of the petition. This subsection does not 
40require court action for stray or abandoned animals as lawfully performed by animal control 
41agents pursuant to section 151A of chapter 140 or any other individual authorized by law.
42 (4) If taking custody of an animal under this section, the enforcing authority shall serve 
43written notice upon the owner or keeper of the animal, in-hand, if such person is known, or leave 
44a copy of the written notice at the location where the animal was removed from, at least 3 days 
45before the hearing is scheduled under subsection (3).
46 (5) The enforcing authority taking custody of an animal under this section shall provide 
47care for the animal until either:
48 (a) The court determines the animal has been neglected and orders the forfeiture of the 
49animal to the enforcing authority, allowing the enforcing authority to permanently transfer the 
50animal; 
51 (b) The court determines the animal has not been neglected and orders the enforcing 
52authority to return the animal to the animal’s owner or keeper, in which case the animal shall be 
53returned to the owner or keeper upon payment by the owner or keeper, for the care and provision 
54for the animal while in the custody of the enforcement authority; or 4 of 6
55 (c) The court determines humane euthanasia is in the best interest of the animal.
56 (6) If the evidence indicates the animal has been neglected, the burden is on the owner or 
57keeper to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he or she is able to humanely care 
58for the animal.
59 (7) After a hearing, the court shall make a determination as to whether the animal has 
60been neglected.
61 (8) In determining whether the animal has been neglected, the court may consider, among 
62other matters:
63 (a) Testimony from the enforcing authority who removed or seized the animal and other 
64witnesses as to the condition of the animal when removed or seized and as to the conditions 
65under which the animal was kept;
66 (b) Testimony and evidence as to the veterinary care provided to the animal;
67 (c) Testimony and evidence as to the type and amount of care provided to the animal;
68 (d) Expert testimony as to the community standards for proper and reasonable care of the 
69same type of animal;
70 (e) Testimony from any witnesses as to prior treatment or condition of this or other 
71animals in the same custody;
72 (f) The owner or keeper’s past record of judgments pursuant to this chapter;
73 (g) Convictions or admissions to sufficient facts pursuant to applicable statutes 
74prohibiting cruelty to animals; 5 of 6
75 (h) Documentary or testimonial evidence of past investigations involving facts and 
76circumstances relating to the care and treatment of any animals; and
77 (i) Other evidence the court considers to be material or relevant.
78 (9) If after a hearing the court determines the animal has been neglected, the court may:
79 (a) Order that the owner or keeper have no further custody of the animal and the animal 
80forfeited to the custody of the enforcing authority or any agency or person the court deems 
81appropriate; or
82 (b) Order the animal be humanely euthanized, if in the best interest of the animal.
83 (10) If after a hearing the court determines the animal has not been neglected or subjected 
84to cruel conditions and orders the enforcing authority to return the animal to the animal’s owner 
85or keeper, the order shall provide that the animal in the possession of the enforcement authority 
86be claimed and removed by the owner or keeper within 7 days after the date of the order. If the 
87animal is not removed within 7 days, the animal shall be deemed abandoned by the owner or 
88keeper.
89 (11) The court’s judgment shall be final and neither party shall have the right to an appeal 
90of the judgment unless there exists a change in circumstance or newly discovered evidence 
91within 10 business days of the final judgment by the court. The appeal shall be in the form of a 
92motion to reconsider to the same justice who presided over the original hearing.
93 (12) The court may order that other animal(s) that are in the custody of the owner or 
94keeper, not removed or seized by the enforcing authority, be forfeited to the enforcing authority 
95if the court determines that the owner or keeper is unable to humanely care for any such  6 of 6
96additional animal(s). The court may prohibit such owner or keeper from harboring, owning, 
97possessing, exercising control over, residing with, adopting, or fostering any additional 
98animal(s).
99 (13) The court, upon proof of costs incurred by the enforcing authority, may require that 
100the owner or keeper pay for the care of the animal while in the custody of the enforcing 
101authority. A separate hearing may be held.
102 (14) Nothing in this section precludes an enforcing authority from applying for a search 
103warrant to seize the animal pursuant to sections 1 through 7 of chapter 276 and section 83 of 
104chapter 272 and from pursuing criminal charges relating to the animal pursuant to the applicable 
105statutes prohibiting cruelty to animals.