Massachusetts House Bill H3282

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/25
• Refer: 2/27/25
• Refer: 7/3/25

Caption

Authorizing the town of Westford to release agricultural preservation restrictions over land owned by Westford Gateway, LLC

Impact

In terms of its effects on state laws, this bill represents a modification of existing agricultural preservation laws, enabling a specific exemption for Westford in regard to land development and urban infrastructure improvements. The measure aims to facilitate transportation enhancements necessary for the local economy while balancing the ongoing preservation of agricultural land. It includes provisions requiring that the land used from this release be restored to its previous condition once the project is completed, thereby attempting to maintain the surrounding environmental integrity.

Summary

House Bill 3282 is a legislative proposal that seeks to authorize the town of Westford to release certain agricultural preservation restrictions over land owned by Westford Gateway, LLC. This bill is specifically concerned with portions of land that are needed for the rehabilitation of Boston Road in Westford, Massachusetts. The proposed action would allow the town to execute a certificate of release from these agricultural restrictions, which could have significant implications for both the development of the designated land and the community's environmental landscape.

Contention

Key points of contention may arise regarding the balance between development and conservation. Proponents of the bill argue that the necessary infrastructure improvements are crucial for the town’s economic growth and accessibility. However, opponents may raise concerns about potential adverse impacts on agricultural land and the effectiveness of restoration efforts following construction. Additionally, the financial aspect of this bill includes a requirement for the Massachusetts Department of Transportation to provide funding for replacement land, which is intended to mitigate any loss of agricultural space, but the adequacy of such provisions could be a focal point in legislative discussions.