Maryland 2022 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB67 Introduced / Bill

Filed 12/22/2021

                     
 
EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. 
        [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. 
          *hb0067*  
  
HOUSE BILL 67 
E5   	2lr0786 
HB 131/21 – JUD 	(PRE–FILED)   
By: Delegate J. Lewis 
Requested: October 18, 2021 
Introduced and read first time: January 12, 2022 
Assigned to: Judiciary 
 
A BILL ENTITLED 
 
AN ACT concerning 1 
 
Correctional Services – Step–Down Programs – Cause of Action 2 
 
FOR the purpose of providing for a certain step–down program that the Commissioner of 3 
Correction is required to provide to a certain inmate in a certain manner; authorizing 4 
a certain civil action for damages; and generally relating to programs for inmates. 5 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 6 
 Article – Correctional Services 7 
Section 9–614(a) 8 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 9 
 (2017 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 10 
 
BY adding to 11 
 Article – Correctional Services 12 
Section 9–614.2 13 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 14 
 (2017 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 15 
 
 SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND	, 16 
That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 17 
 
Article – Correctional Services 18 
 
9–614. 19 
 
 (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. 20 
 
 (2) “Correctional unit” has the meaning stated in § 2–401 of this article. 21 
 
 (3) (i) “Restrictive housing” means a form of physical separation that 22  2 	HOUSE BILL 67  
 
 
has not been requested by the inmate in which the inmate is placed in a locked room or cell 1 
for approximately 22 hours or more out of a 24–hour period. 2 
 
 (ii) “Restrictive housing” includes administrative segregation and 3 
disciplinary segregation. 4 
 
9–614.2. 5 
 
 (A) (1) IN THIS SECTION THE F OLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 6 
INDICATED. 7 
 
 (2) “MULTIDISCIPLINARY TRE ATMENT TEAM ” MEANS AN 8 
INTEGRATED TEAM THAT MEETS TO DEVELOP AND PROVIDE NECESSARY HE ALTH 9 
AND BEHAVIORAL HEALT H CARE SERVICES AND INDIVIDUALIZED TREAT MENT THAT 10 
ADDRESSES THE NEEDS OF AN INMATE IN REST RICTIVE HOUSING OR I N A  11 
STEP–DOWN PROGRAM . 12 
 
 (3) “STEP–DOWN PROGRAM ” MEANS A SYSTEM OF RE VIEW WITH 13 
ESTABLISHED CRITERIA THAT PREPARES AN INM ATE FOR TRANSITION T O THE 14 
GENERAL POPULATION O R THE COMMUNITY . 15 
 
 (B) BEFORE THE TRANSFER O F AN INMATE PLACED I N RESTRICTIVE 16 
HOUSING TO THE GENER AL POPULATION OR THE DIRECT RELEASE OF AN INMATE 17 
FROM A FACILITY TO T HE COMMUNITY , THE COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION SHALL 18 
PROVIDE TO THE INMAT E A STEP–DOWN PROGRAM . 19 
 
 (C) (1) A STEP–DOWN PROGRAM SHALL B E INDIVIDUALIZED TO THE 20 
NEEDS OF THE INMATE AND INVOLVE A COORDI NATED, MULTIDISCIPLINARY 21 
TREATMENT TEAM APPRO ACH. 22 
 
 (2) A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TR EATMENT TEAM MAY INC	LUDE 23 
PSYCHOLOGISTS , PSYCHIATRIC PRACTITI ONERS, LICENSED SOCIAL WORK ERS, 24 
LICENSED MENTAL HEAL TH COUNSELORS , REGISTERED NURSES , ACTIVITY 25 
THERAPISTS, AND CORRECTIONAL STA FF. 26 
 
 (3) IF AN INMATE NEEDS CH RONIC CARE OR OTHER SIGNIFICANT 27 
MEDICAL ACCOMMODATIO N TO PARTI CIPATE IN THE PROGRA	M, THE 28 
MULTIDISCIPLINARY TR EATMENT TEAM SHALL I NCLUDE APPROPRIATE M EDICAL 29 
PERSONNEL . 30 
 
 (D) A STEP–DOWN PROGRAM SHALL I NCLUDE: 31 
 
 (1) A PRE–SCREENING EVALUATION ; 32 
   	HOUSE BILL 67 	3 
 
 
 (2) MONTHLY EVALUATIONS 	USING A MULTIDISCIPL INARY 1 
TREATMENT TEAM APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE I NMATE’S COMPLIANCE WITH 2 
PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ; 3 
 
 (3) SUBJECT TO MONTHLY E VALUATIONS: 4 
 
 (I) GRADUALLY INCREASED OUT–OF–CELL TIME; 5 
 
 (II) GRADUALLY INCREASED GROUP INTERACTION ; 6 
 
 (III) GRADUALLY INCREASED EDUCATION AND PROGRA MMING 7 
OPPORTUNITIES ; AND 8 
 
 (IV) GRADUALLY INCREASED PRIVILEGES; 9 
 
 (4) A STEP–DOWN TRANSITION COMP LIANCE REVIEW ; AND 10 
 
 (5) A POSTSCREENING EVAL UATION. 11 
 
 (E) AN INMATE WITH LESS T HAN 180 DAYS UNTIL RELEASE T O THE 12 
COMMUNITY MAY NOT BE DENIED ACCESS TO A S TEP–DOWN PROGRAM UNLESS TH E 13 
WARDEN OR THE WARDEN ’S DESIGNEE MAKES AN INDIVIDUALIZED DETER MINATION 14 
CERTIFIED IN WRITING AND BASED ON CLEAR A ND CONVINCING EVIDEN CE THAT 15 
THE INMATE POSES : 16 
 
 (1) A GRAVE RISK OF HARM TO OTHERS OR THE SEC URITY OF THE 17 
FACILITY AND ALL OTHER LESS RESTRICTIVE OPTIONS HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED ; OR 18 
 
 (2) AN IMMEDIATE AND CRE DIBLE FLIGHT RISK TH AT CANNOT BE 19 
REASONABLY PREVENTED BY OTHER MEANS . 20 
 
 (F) THE COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION SHALL DOCU MENT IN WRITING 21 
THE JUSTIFICATION FO R AN INMATE BEING TR ANSFERRED DIRECTLY F ROM 22 
RESTRICTIVE HOUSING TO THE GENERAL POPUL ATION OR RELEASED DI RECTLY 23 
FROM INCARCERATION T O THE COMMUNITY WITH OUT HAVING PARTICIPA TED IN A 24 
STEP–DOWN PROGRAM . 25 
 
 (G) A FORMER INMATE WHO HA S SUFFERED A SPECIFI C AND DIRECT INJURY 26 
FROM A DE NIAL OF THE RIGHT TO ACCESS A STEP–DOWN PROGRAM UNDER T HIS 27 
SECTION MAY BRING A CIVIL ACTION IN A CO URT OF COMPETENT JUR ISDICTION FOR 28 
DAMAGES, INCLUDING COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY ’S FEES. 29 
 
 SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take e ffect 30 
October 1, 2022. 31