Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB507

Introduced
1/28/22  
Refer
1/28/22  
Report Pass
3/30/22  
Engrossed
3/31/22  
Refer
3/31/22  
Refer
4/11/22  
Report Pass
4/11/22  
Enrolled
4/11/22  

Caption

Procurement - Construction Contracts - Contract Modification - Report

Impact

The legislation may significantly affect state laws regarding procurement processes by instituting standardized modifications to construction contracts. This change is intended to promote fiscal responsibility in state-funded construction projects, allowing adjustments without compromising project integrity. By requiring detailed assessments and certifications for such modifications, the bill aims to prevent budget overruns and ensure project completion within the allocated fiscal parameters.

Summary

Senate Bill 507 mandates that all procurement contracts for construction must include a clause that allows for contract modifications in the event of a substantial increase in material prices. This requirement addresses issues related to fluctuations in material costs that may arise from various unforeseen circumstances, such as delays in notice to commence work or the discovery of hazardous conditions on-site. By implementing this policy, the bill aims to protect both the state and contractors, ensuring that financial implications of construction contracts are adequately managed.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB507 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators and stakeholders focused on the integrity of public procurement processes. Advocates argue that the legislation provides necessary safeguards against financial uncertainties that could derail essential infrastructure projects. However, there may be concerns from smaller contractors about the administrative burden these requirements place on them, particularly regarding compliance and documentation associated with contract modifications.

Contention

Despite the overall positive reception, some contention arises concerning the potential bureaucratic obstacles introduced by the bill. Critics may worry that the requirement for price adjustments and fiscal certifications could slow down the procurement process and hinder timely project execution. Additionally, the application of the bill is prospective, which means it won't affect any contracts executed before its enactment, potentially leading to disparities in existing projects and the new regulations established by this law.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MD SB358

Procurement - Construction Contracts - Contract Modification Clause

MD HB1499

State Procurement - Construction and Services - Contract Modification

MD SB403

State Procurement - Construction and Services - Contract Modification

MD AB1957

Public contracts: best value construction contracting for counties.

MD SB556

Procurement – Construction Contingency Fund

MD HB852

State Procurement - Leases and Construction Contracts - Performance Suspension Pending Audit

MD SB128

Public contracts: Best Value Construction Contracting for Counties Pilot Program.

MD SB18

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management and design-build contracting.

MD SB715

State and Private Construction Contracts and State Procurement Contracts – Prompt Payment and Interest Requirements

MD HB1108

Virginia Public Procurement Act; construction management and design-build contracting.

Similar Bills

CA AB851

Local agency contracts.

CA SB914

Local agency contracts: construction manager at-risk construction contracts.

CA SB739

Construction manager at-risk construction contracts: City of Elk Grove: zoo project.

CA AB1932

Public contracts: construction manager at-risk construction contracts.

AZ SB1099

Progressive design-build; ADOT

MO SB1257

Establishes provisions relating to construction contracts

MO SB615

Establishes provisions relating to construction contracts

CA AB1223

Construction contract payments: Internet Web site posting.