Maryland Senate Bill SB374

Maryland 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/24
• Refer: 1/17/24
• Report Pass: 2/26/24
• Engrossed: 2/29/24
• Refer: 3/1/24
• Report Pass: 3/25/24
• Enrolled: 3/28/24
• Chaptered: 4/9/24
• Passed: 4/9/24

Caption

State Emergency Medical Services Board - Licenses and Certificates - Application Requirements

Impact

The passage of SB374 will amend existing laws pertaining to the licensure of EMS personnel in Maryland, aiming to streamline the application process and remove barriers that might prevent eligible individuals from obtaining certification. Particularly, this bill seeks to improve access to careers in emergency medical services for individuals who may otherwise be disqualified due to strict documentation requirements related to immigration status or residency. Additionally, it places a stronger emphasis on the collection of child support from individuals in arrears, linking licensing with the enforcement of child support obligations.

Summary

Senate Bill 374 focuses on the application requirements for licenses and certificates issued by the State Emergency Medical Services Board (EMS Board) in Maryland. The bill prohibits the EMS Board from requiring applicants to prove their lawful presence in the U.S. or provide a Social Security number (SSN) or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) as a condition for licensure or certification. Instead, the bill mandates that applicants must disclose their SSN or ITIN, or provide alternative documentation in compliance with federal law, with the information recorded for potential child support enforcement purposes.

Sentiment

The reception of SB374 among legislators and stakeholders appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill promotes inclusivity in essential emergency services roles and facilitates a more diverse workforce. They highlight the importance of making the EMS profession accessible to qualified individuals regardless of their immigration status or economic background. Conversely, opponents express concerns regarding the implications of reducing documentation requirements, suggesting that it could undermine the integrity of the licensing process and complicate enforcement measures regarding child support obligations.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB374 include debates regarding the balance between facilitating job access for qualified personnel and ensuring adequate regulatory oversight in safeguarding public health and safety. Critics of the bill question whether a less stringent licensing process could lead to unintended consequences, such as undermining the ability of the state to ensure that those providing emergency medical services meet necessary qualifications and standards. The discussions reflect broader societal issues around immigration policy and the intersection of public service with child welfare enforcement.