Maine Senate Bill LD1653

Maine 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/13/23
• Refer: 4/13/23
• Engrossed: 6/20/23
• Enrolled: 6/20/23
• Passed: 7/25/23

Caption

RESOLUTION, Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of Maine to Allow Persons Under Guardianship for Mental Illness to Be Electors

Impact

If enacted, LD1653 would significantly alter the qualifications for electors in Maine, specifically addressing the disenfranchisement of individuals under guardianship related to mental health issues. This change is expected to expand the democratic participation of these individuals and ensure that their rights as citizens are upheld in line with national standards. Legal voters across the state would have the opportunity to affirm this amendment in the upcoming November election, reflecting broader societal shifts towards inclusivity.

Summary

LD1653 is a proposed amendment to the Constitution of Maine that seeks to allow individuals who are under guardianship due to mental illness the right to vote. The resolution aims to remove the existing provisions that prevent these individuals from participating in elections for Governor, Senators, and Representatives, asserting that such restrictions are a violation of the United States Constitution and federal law. The bill proposes that this amendment be voted on in a statewide referendum, where voters will decide whether to ratify this change to the state's constitution.

Sentiment

The sentiment around LD1653 appears to be largely positive, as the bill was passed with an overwhelming majority in the legislature, securing 84 votes in favor compared to 12 against. Supporters highlight the importance of restoring voting rights and affirming the dignity of individuals with mental health challenges. Nevertheless, there may be some contention regarding how guardianship is defined and the implications of extending voting rights to individuals under guardianship, though this was not a focal point in the captured legislative discussions.

Contention

One notable point of contention that could arise with LD1653 concerns the practical implications of allowing individuals under guardianship to vote. Critics may argue about the potential risks associated with this policy, questioning whether individuals under guardianship can make informed decisions. Furthermore, the amendment to the existing laws and the ramifications for guardianship laws more broadly could prompt debates on the adequacy and effectiveness of current support systems for mentally ill individuals in making rational electoral choices.