Michigan House Bill HB4150

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/23
• Refer: 2/28/23

Caption

Weapons: other; gun-free zones; expand to include all buildings owned or leased by this state. Amends sec. 234d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.234d). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4149'23

Impact

The implementation of HB4150 is expected to have significant implications for residents and visitors in the state of Michigan. By extending gun-free zones to all state-owned buildings, the legislation would create a greater number of locations where individuals are prohibited from carrying firearms. This change is framed as a proactive measure to reduce gun violence and improve safety in environments where vulnerable populations, such as children and the elderly, may be present. However, this may also lead to increased scrutiny and enforcement measures regarding firearm possession in these areas.

Summary

House Bill 4150 proposes amendments to the Michigan penal code specifically focusing on the prohibition of firearm possession in various designated gun-free zones. The bill expands the scope of these zones to include all buildings owned or leased by the state. This legislative move aims to enhance public safety by restricting the presence of firearms in sensitive environments, including financial institutions, places of worship, courthouses, theaters, sports arenas, day care centers, hospitals, and other public state-owned properties.

Contention

While proponents argue that HB4150 is a necessary step towards safeguarding public spaces from potential gun-related incidents, critics raise concerns about the effectiveness of such legislation. They question whether simply increasing the number of gun-free zones can effectively deter violence. Additionally, there is apprehension regarding the enforcement of these restrictions and potential impacts on responsible gun owners who may inadvertently violate the newly established boundaries. The discussions around this bill highlight a broader national debate on gun control and the balance between safety and individual rights.