Michigan House Bill HB5209

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/24/23
• Refer: 10/24/23
• Report Pass: 11/1/23
• Engrossed: 11/9/23
• Refer: 11/9/23
• Report Pass: 3/19/24
• Refer: 3/19/24
• Enrolled: 3/19/24
• Chaptered: 4/9/24
• Passed: 4/9/24

Caption

Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for surrogate parentage contracts involving minors or intellectually disabled and for compensation; remove. Amends sec. 15g, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.15g). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5207'23

Impact

The amendments put forth in HB 5209 would bring about significant changes to state law by introducing clearer guidelines on the legal ramifications surrounding surrogate parentage. This is particularly important in safeguarding the interests of minors and individuals with intellectual disabilities, rendering existing provisions more responsive and aligned with contemporary societal values. The changes attempt to bridge gaps in the legal framework that may have previously led to ambiguity or inconsistent application of the law.

Summary

House Bill 5209 proposes amendments to existing criminal procedure laws, specifically within the context of sentencing guidelines in relation to surrogate parentage contracts involving minors or individuals with intellectual disabilities. The bill aims to update and refine the legal framework governing these sensitive matters, ensuring the rights of all involved parties are adequately protected while clarifying the conditions under which legal responsibilities arise for surrogate parents.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB 5209 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters, who feel that the bill addresses critical issues related to surrogate parentage and the rights of vulnerable populations. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the adequacy of protections included in the bill, particularly as it relates to ensuring comprehensive safeguards for minors involved in surrogate arrangements. The dialogue surrounding the bill highlights a nuanced appreciation for the complexity of surrogate parentage and its profound implications on family law.

Contention

Notable points of contention arose during the discussions, particularly around the adequacy of protections for surrogate children and the financial compensations related to surrogate parentage contracts. Critics of the bill argue that without thorough provisions, there could be risks of exploitation or mismanagement of surrogate agreements. Moreover, the tie-bar with HB 5207 raises questions regarding the interplay between the two bills, potentially complicating legislative outcomes and how these laws will be harmonized within the broader context of criminal justice and family law.