Michigan House Bill HB5892

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/30/24
• Refer: 7/30/24

Caption

State agencies (existing): generally; classifications used in state agency writings requesting racial or ethnic identification; modify. Repeals sec. 206a of 1984 PA 431 (MCL 18.1206a).

Impact

The repeal of this section could have wide-ranging implications for how state agencies collect and utilize demographic data in their processes. By removing this requirement, the bill may affect how agencies assess performance, allocate resources, and implement targeted programs. Critics may express concern that the repeal could diminish the ability to track disparities based on race or ethnicity in public services, thus potentially impacting equity in state resource distribution.

Summary

House Bill 5892 proposes the repeal of Section 206a of the Management and Budget Act, which pertains to the classifications used by state agencies when requesting racial or ethnic identification. This section was added in 1995 and its elimination signifies a shift in how the state may handle demographic data. The bill emphasizes a more streamlined approach aimed at improving state functions and possibly enhancing data privacy considerations by reducing mandated classifications in government forms.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding HB5892, including fears that repealing the requirement for racial and ethnic identification could hinder efforts to address systemic inequalities. Proponents of the bill argue for privacy and simplicity, suggesting that the status quo complicates processes without providing substantial benefits. However, opponents express that such data is critical for transparency and accountability in state functions, particularly for ensuring that marginalized communities receive adequate support.

Additional_details

House Bill 5892 contains a stipulation that it will only take effect if another specified bill is enacted into law, indicating a strategic approach in legislating fiscal responsibility and budget management. The interdependencies suggest that lawmakers are considering broader fiscal strategies beyond this single repeal, hinting at potential reforms in the state budgeting framework.