Michigan Senate Bill SB0338

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/11/23
• Refer: 5/11/23

Caption

Counties: charter; election of county executive in a charter county; modify election schedule to the presidential election years. Amends 1966 PA 293 (MCL 45.501 - 45.521) by adding sec. 14b.

Impact

This legislation will have significant implications for local governance, particularly for counties that are low in population and may not have previously established a charter system of governance. By standardizing the election of county executives to align with the presidential election years, SB 338 seeks to increase voter turnout and engagement in these elections. Furthermore, the bill aims to reinforce the democratic process by ensuring that the leadership of local governments is elected on a partisan basis, thus promoting accountability and transparency within smaller counties.

Summary

Senate Bill 338 aims to amend the existing 1966 Public Act 293, which governs the establishment and operation of charter counties in Michigan. The proposed amendment introduces a new section that outlines the election schedule for county executives in counties with populations under one million. Specifically, it stipulates that such counties must elect their county executive at large on a partisan basis during the general election in November 2026, which would commence a two-year term starting January 1, 2027, and concluding on December 31, 2028. Thereafter, elections for the county executive would occur every four years, beginning in November 2028, ensuring that the position remains elected and accountable to the electorate.

Contention

The introduction of SB 338 may raise concerns and points of contention among stakeholders. Proponents of the amendment argue that aligning local elections with major election years could enhance civic participation and lead to more informed electorates. However, opponents may contend that mandating a partisan election at the local level could politicize what should ideally be a nonpartisan role. Additionally, this shift might disadvantage some counties that are used to more localized governance structures without partisan affiliations, leading to resistance from local officials who prefer to maintain their autonomy in leadership selection.