Michigan Senate Bill SB0494

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/14/23
• Refer: 9/14/23
• Report Pass: 12/10/24
• Refer: 12/10/24
• Report Pass: 12/12/24
• Engrossed: 12/13/24
• Refer: 12/13/24

Caption

Records: other; federal decennial census data; update to reflect pre-incarceration address of incarcerated individuals and require the independent citizens redistricting commission to consider. Creates new act.

Impact

SB 494 is poised to significantly influence state laws surrounding electoral processes and criminal justice. By prioritizing the collection of demographic data at the time of incarceration, the bill seeks to ensure that the incarcerated population is accurately reflected in redistricting efforts. This move could potentially affect the allocation of resources and representation for communities with high incarceration rates. Legislators supporting the bill argue that it will help address significant population disparities that could lead to underrepresentation in state and local governing bodies.

Summary

Senate Bill 494 aims to enhance the collection of residential and demographic information regarding incarcerated individuals within Michigan's correctional facilities. Specifically, the bill mandates that the Department of Corrections gather data on each inmate's pre-incarceration address and demographic details at the time of their entry into the system. This information is intended to support the work of the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission in creating fair and accurate electoral district maps based on demographic shifts and populations, particularly following federal decennial census data. The bill sets timelines for these collections, emphasizing accountability in data handling and usage.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 494 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents who view the bill as a necessary step towards ensuring fair representation and addressing systemic issues within the criminal justice environment. However, some stakeholders express concern regarding the implications of collecting such data, fearing it may be misused or stigmatize individuals who are incarcerated. Opponents worry that without proper safeguards, the data could be employed for purposes beyond redistricting, potentially impacting funding or services for both individuals and communities.

Contention

A notable point of contention involves fears regarding privacy and the handling of sensitive data collected under this bill. Critics argue that while the intention of improving electoral representation is commendable, the mechanism of data collection and reporting must be handled with transparency and care to protect the rights of incarcerated individuals. Additionally, there are discussions around the efficacy of using this data in the redistricting process, questioning whether it accurately reflects the community's needs or if it may lead to further marginalization of specific populations.