Michigan Senate Bill SB0662

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/9/23
• Refer: 11/9/23
• Report Pass: 2/21/24
• Refer: 2/21/24
• Report Pass: 2/27/24
• Engrossed: 2/28/24
• Refer: 2/28/24
• Report Pass: 6/13/24
• Enrolled: 6/26/24
• Chaptered: 7/30/24
• Passed: 7/30/24

Caption

Natural resources: inland lakes; financing provisions and definition of lake level; revise. Amends secs. 30701, 30711, 30716 & 30717 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.30701 et seq.).

Impact

The legislation significantly impacts local governance and financing structures by enabling special assessment districts to borrow funds and accept resources from both public and private entities for lake level projects. It also stipulates that costs incurred for maintaining proper water levels can be charged to property owners who benefit from these projects. This provision is expected to streamline lake management operations and optimize financial mechanisms for local governments tasked with environmental stewardship.

Summary

Senate Bill 0662 aims to amend existing legislation concerning the management and financing related to inland lakes in Michigan. The bill amends key sections of the 1994 Public Act 451, enhancing clarity around the responsibilities of local agencies and outlining the powers of the county drain commissioner and the county board of commissioners regarding inland lake projects. A significant focus of the bill is the establishment and maintenance of the 'normal level' for inland lakes, which is defined as the ideal range of water levels for the benefit of public health, safety, and natural resource preservation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 0662 appears to be generally supportive among those involved in local governance and environmental management, as it seeks to provide clearer guidelines and provisions for effectively addressing and financing the maintenance of inland lakes. However, concerns may exist regarding financial equity and the responsibilities imposed on local residents, particularly those who may be subjected to special assessments without adequate representation or say in funding decisions.

Contention

A notable point of contention relates to the financial implications for local communities. Critics might argue that the bill could prioritize financial obligations over environmental considerations or that it could unduly burden property owners with assessments for projects that primarily serve broader community interests. The balance between fiscal responsibility and environmental protection will likely remain a central theme in discussions around this bill as it progresses.