Michigan Senate Bill SB1085

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/7/24
• Refer: 11/7/24
• Report Pass: 12/4/24
• Refer: 12/4/24
• Engrossed: 12/5/24

Caption

Crimes: other; adultery law; repeal. Repeals secs. 29, 30, 31 & 32 of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.29 et seq.).

Impact

If enacted, SB 1085 would have a significant impact on state laws related to personal conduct, particularly those governing marital relationships. The bill's repeal of adultery-related offenses may reduce the legal repercussions currently faced by individuals in such matters, thereby expressing a shift in state policy toward a more progressive stance on personal choices. Furthermore, proponents believe this change could lead to fewer cases in the courts that are based on these particular laws, streamlining judicial focus onto more relevant legal matters.

Summary

Senate Bill 1085 proposes the repeal of sections 29, 30, 31, and 32 of the Michigan penal code, which pertain to laws against adultery. By removing these sections, the bill seeks to eliminate what some view as outdated and socially irrelevant offenses from the state's legal framework. Advocates for the bill argue that the criminalization of adultery is an unnecessary intrusion into personal relationships, reflecting a societal evolution away from punitive measures for such private matters. This repeal aligns with a broader movement toward decriminalizing acts that do not pose a direct threat to public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1085 appears to be generally positive among its supporters, who view it as a necessary modernization of the penal code that reflects contemporary values. There is, however, some contention among conservative groups who feel that removing these laws could undermine traditional marital standards. Nevertheless, the sentiment overall leans towards support, with advocates emphasizing the need to respect individual freedoms and personal autonomy over outdated statutes.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB 1085 revolve around the broader implications of repealing laws that govern personal and moral behavior. Opponents of the repeal argue that eliminating laws against adultery could weaken the social fabric by reducing the consequences of infidelity, which could have ripple effects on marriage as an institution. However, supporters counter that these laws have rarely been enforced and that their elimination will not hinder the values or stability of marital relationships; rather, they will promote a more sensible legal landscape that prioritizes relevant laws.