Michigan House Bill HB4063

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/25
• Refer: 2/6/25
• Report Pass: 2/18/25
• Engrossed: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/25/25

Caption

Public employees and officers: ethics; certain former officers of the executive branch of state government; prohibit from engaging in certain lobbying activities for a period of time. Amends 1978 PA 472 (MCL 4.411 - 4.431) by adding sec. 6b.

Impact

If enacted, HB4063 would impose strict limitations on lobbying activities by former high-ranking officials, establishing a clear boundary between public service and private lobbying endeavors. This change is designed to promote accountability and transparency while potentially enhancing public confidence in the legislative process. The introduction of a misdemeanor penalty for violations, including fines and imprisonment, underscores the seriousness of adherence to these new regulations, signaling a robust stance on political ethics in Michigan.

Summary

House Bill 4063 seeks to amend the existing 1978 Public Act 472, which regulates political activity and lobbying in Michigan. The bill specifically targets former state executives, including governors, lieutenant governors, and heads of principal departments, prohibiting them from engaging in lobbying activities for a period of two years after leaving office. This provision aims to prevent potential conflicts of interest and uphold ethical standards within the state government, as the revolving door between public service and lobbying can undermine public trust and integrity in governance.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB4063 appears to be supportive from advocates of political reform and ethics, who view the bill as a necessary step to curb undue influence and protect the integrity of the political system. By restricting lobbying activities for former officials, the bill addresses concerns about the potential for corruption and impropriety. However, there could also be some opposition from those who argue that the bill may limit the ability of experienced individuals to contribute to public policy discussions post-tenure, which could hinder informed lobbying efforts.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the balance between ethical governance and the need for experienced voices in the policy-making arena. While proponents assert that the bill is vital for preventing corruption, opponents may express concern that overly stringent measures could deter qualified individuals from entering public office, given the potential restrictions on their future career options. The debate highlights the ongoing challenge of ensuring ethical conduct in government while also fostering an open and collaborative environment for policy advocacy.