Michigan House Bill HB4483

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/8/25
• Refer: 5/8/25

Caption

Weapons: concealed; QR code on concealed pistol licenses; provide for. Amends sec. 5c of 1927 PA 372 (MCL 28.425c). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4481'25

Impact

The proposed amendments to the 1927 Public Act 372 will have significant implications on firearms regulation laws in Michigan. The QR code addition is an attempt to merge technology with public safety measures, potentially fostering a more efficient license verification process. Additionally, the bill seeks to clarify certain conditions under which licenses are issued, thereby reinforcing statutory guidelines for concealed carry. By regulating the appearance and contents of the license itself, the bill attempts to standardize the licensing process and prevent the issuance of fraudulent documentation.

Summary

House Bill 4483 aims to amend existing legislation regulating the sale, purchase, possession, and carrying of certain firearms, gas ejecting devices, and electro-muscular disruption devices in Michigan. The bill introduces a requirement for concealed pistol licenses to feature a QR code, providing a modern approach to licensing that enhances accessibility and usability. This measure is intended to improve the tracking and verification of licenses, ensuring that they are easily recognized by law enforcement and understood by the public. Essentially, the bill reflects a response to the need for more robust documentation in the realm of personal firearm safety and regulation.

Contention

However, the bill may face contention from various advocacy groups and individuals who may feel that the introduction of technology in firearm regulation could lead to privacy concerns or unintended consequences in law enforcement practices. Critics may argue that while the intent is to enhance public safety, the added complexities of features like QR codes could create barriers for lawful gun owners or complicate interactions with law enforcement. The balance between effective regulation and individual rights will likely be a point of debate as discussions surrounding HB4483 progress.