Michigan House Bill HB4746

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/22/25
• Refer: 7/22/25

Caption

Human services: food assistance; chip-enabled bridge cards; require. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding sec. 14n.

Impact

The introduction of chip-enabled bridge cards is anticipated to improve the safety of transactions for recipients by reducing the potential for fraud. This change could streamline processes associated with food assistance programs, making it easier for beneficiaries to access their benefits in a secure manner. Additionally, integrating technology into these welfare programs may lead to cost savings for the state in terms of reducing administrative overhead and fraud management.

Summary

House Bill 4746 proposes an amendment to the Social Welfare Act, specifically adding a new section that mandates the issuance of chip-enabled Michigan bridge cards to recipients of food assistance or cash assistance benefits. This bill aims to enhance the security and efficiency of benefits distribution in Michigan by integrating modern technology into the existing welfare framework. The proposed changes are expected to be implemented within one year of the bill's enactment and will align with federal laws governing such assistance programs.

Conclusion

Overall, HB4746 reflects a trend towards modernization in welfare programs and aligns with ongoing efforts to secure public assistance benefits. It aims to not only protect vulnerable populations but also facilitate better management by the state. Moving forward, careful consideration of the implementation process and addressing any concerns regarding accessibility will be essential for the bill's success.

Contention

While the bill has significant support for its potential to enhance security, there may also be points of contention regarding the implementation costs and the pace at which this technological update is made. Some critics may argue that transitioning to chip-enabled cards could involve substantial upfront costs that the state needs to consider. Furthermore, there might be concerns raised about accessibility for beneficiaries who are not technologically savvy or lack access to required infrastructure.