Michigan Senate Bill SB0356

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/5/25
• Refer: 6/5/25

Caption

Vehicles: driver training; instructor of a driver education instructor preparation course; modify requirements to become. Amends sec. 23 of 2006 PA 384 (MCL 256.643).

Impact

The bill outlines specific requirements for the driver education instructor preparation program, which must consist of at least four courses covering critical areas such as driver task analysis, classroom knowledge, vehicle operation skills, and practical teaching experiences. It mandates that these courses span a specific duration and cover required content, ensuring that instructors are well-equipped to train new drivers effectively. Additionally, the legislation requires that program proposals be substantiated with satisfactory evidence demonstrating their adherence to newly established standards, which potentially elevates the overall driving education framework within Michigan.

Summary

Senate Bill 356 seeks to amend the 2006 PA 384, known as the Driver Education Provider and Instructor Act, particularly focusing on section 23 regarding the preparation and qualifications for driver education instructors. The bill stipulates that colleges, universities, or individuals must obtain approval from the secretary of state before offering a driver education instructor preparation program. This approach aims to standardize the training and qualification required of instructors to enhance the quality of driver education across the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the extent of oversight imposed by the secretary of state as detailed in the bill. Critics might argue this could lead to overly bureaucratic processes that could stifle innovative educational approaches at the college level. Proponents, however, would likely stress the necessity for stringent guidelines to maintain high instructional standards, potentially reducing the risk of inadequately trained instructors. Thus, the balance between regulatory oversight and educational freedom could be a significant debate point as the bill progresses through the legislative process.