Minnesota House Bill HF1133

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Refer: 3/8/23

Caption

Minnesota Management and Budget funding provided to increase the agency's capacity to assist groups and organizations with capital budget process and coordinate with state agencies regarding the administration of capital project appropriations and programs, and money appropriated.

Impact

If enacted, HF1133 would amend current state funding mechanisms to bolster the support provided to underrepresented communities in Minnesota. The additional funding and resources allocated to MMB are intended to break down existing barriers in the capital budgeting process, thus encouraging greater participation from diverse groups. Statewide efforts may result in increased awareness and accessibility in securing funds for essential infrastructure and community development projects. This change is expected to have positive implications for economic development and social equity across the state.

Summary

House File 1133 (HF1133) is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing the capacity of the Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB) to assist various groups and organizations with the capital budget process. This bill appropriates funds to MMB specifically to increase its ability to coordinate and manage capital project appropriations and programs effectively. The focus is particularly on groups that have historically faced barriers to participating in the state's capital budget process, such as nonprofits, American Indian communities, and communities of color. By providing these groups with the necessary technical assistance, the bill aims to ensure a more inclusive approach to capital project funding.

Contention

The debate surrounding HF1133 may revolve around issues of fiscal responsibility and the effectiveness of increased funding for MMB. Proponents argue that the bill represents a necessary investment in communities that have traditionally lacked access to capital funding, promoting economic growth and equality. Conversely, critics may raise concerns about the appropriateness of the state's investment priorities and the administrative capabilities of MMB to handle these allocations efficiently. Thus, the bill may face scrutiny regarding its funding sources and the potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies during implementation.