Minnesota House Bill HF1631

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/23
• Refer: 2/13/23

Caption

Boundary waters area economic relief program created, and money appropriated.

Impact

If enacted, HF1631 will modify existing state law by creating a specific appropriation for economic relief targeted at businesses suffering losses due to state land management decisions, namely the closure of a popular natural area. The effectiveness of the relief will be monitored through established performance measures, which will assess job creation, retention outcomes, and the overall fiscal impact of the assistance provided. This program will also streamline administrative processes by exempting certain rulemaking requirements that would typically apply to such grant programs.

Summary

House File 1631 proposes the establishment of a Boundary Waters Area Economic Relief Program aimed at assisting businesses that have been adversely affected by the 2021 closure of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. The bill outlines a framework for providing grants of up to $50,000 to eligible businesses located in municipalities surrounding the affected wilderness area. To qualify for relief, businesses must demonstrate a reduction in gross receipts of at least ten percent compared to the previous year and explain how the closure contributed to this decline. The bill emphasizes the need for criteria set by the commissioner of employment and economic development for evaluating and administering grant applications.

Contention

Debate surrounding HF1631 may arise primarily from differing views on government intervention in private business operations. Proponents argue that the economic relief program is a necessary response to unforeseen challenges faced by local businesses due to environmental policy decisions, aiming to bolster economic recovery in affected areas. Conversely, some critics might contend that direct grants could encourage dependency on government support or question the criteria for eligibility and fairness in the distribution of funds. The bill's passage would set a precedent for how state responses to economic impacts from closures of natural areas are handled in the future.