Minnesota House Bill HF1312

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/20/25

Caption

Facility fees for nonemergency services provided at provider-based clinics prohibited, facility fees for certain health care services prohibited, and report required.

Impact

If enacted, HF1312 will bring significant changes to how healthcare facilities manage billing practices associated with nonemergency services. The legislation would prevent hospitals and health systems from adding separate facility fees for services rendered at provider-based clinics, ensuring greater transparency in patient billing. By mandating annual reporting of facility fee information to the commissioner of health, the bill aims to improve accountability and transparency, creating a more consumer-friendly healthcare environment. Should this bill pass, it may lead to lower out-of-pocket costs for patients and challenge existing pricing models within healthcare systems. This change intends to promote more equitable access to services, particularly for individuals reliant on healthcare services without substantial financial means to cover unexpected fees.

Summary

House File 1312 is a proposed legislation aimed at prohibiting facility fees charged by provider-based clinics for nonemergency services. The bill establishes clear definitions for facility fees, which are defined as any additional charges beyond standard physician fees intended to cover operational costs associated with the services provided. Specifically, the legislation targets facility fees in relation to outpatient evaluation and management services, making it imperative for health care providers to adhere to the new guidelines regarding pricing for these services. The bill further emphasizes prohibitions on facility fees for telehealth services, expanding its impact to digital healthcare. The overall aim is to alleviate the financial burden on patients accessing necessary nonemergency healthcare services.

Contention

The discussion surrounding HF1312 may raise challenges and opposition related to financial models of healthcare providers. While the intention of the bill aligns with consumer protection by eliminating surprise fees, healthcare providers may argue that the removal of facility fees could jeopardize their operational funding, resulting in constraints on service provision. As this legislation could alter the financial landscape for provider-based clinics, stakeholders may debate the implications for service accessibility, quality, and overall health outcomes. The potential for regulatory changes in how healthcare services are billed could lead to a mixed response from the healthcare community, where the need for patient cost reduction must be weighed against operational sustainability.