Minnesota 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF152 Introduced / Bill

Filed 01/22/2025

                    1.1	A bill for an act​
1.2 relating to state government; establishing the position of director of grants​
1.3 management and oversight within the Department of Administration; requiring​
1.4 standards related to grantmaking and grants management practices; requiring​
1.5 reports; amending Minnesota Statutes 2024, sections 16B.97, subdivisions 2, 3,​
1.6 4, 5; 16B.98, subdivisions 4, 5, 6, 7.​
1.7BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:​
1.8 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 16B.97, subdivision 2, is amended to read:​
1.9 Subd. 2.Grants governance.The commissioner must appoint a director of grants​
1.10management and oversight. At a minimum, the director must have demonstrated professional​
1.11experience in auditing and legal compliance related to grantmaking within a large, complex​
1.12organization. The commissioner director shall provide leadership and direction for oversee​
1.13the implementation of law and policy related to grants management in Minnesota in order.​
1.14The director's responsibilities are to: (1) foster more consistent, streamlined interaction​
1.15between executive agencies, funders, and grantees that will enhance access to grant​
1.16opportunities and information; (2) ensure compliance with laws relating to grantmaking​
1.17and the grants management process; and lead to greater program accountability and​
1.18transparency (3) be a resource in ensuring public accountability and transparency in grant​
1.19programs administered by executive agencies. The commissioner director has the duties​
1.20and powers stated in this section and section 16B.98. Executive agencies shall fully cooperate​
1.21with the commissioner director in the creation, management, and oversight of state grants​
1.22and must do what the commissioner director requires under this section. The commissioner​
1.23director may adopt rules to carry out grants governance, oversight, and management.​
1​Section 1.​
REVISOR SGS/MI 25-01447​12/17/24 ​
State of Minnesota​
This Document can be made available​
in alternative formats upon request​
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES​
H. F. No.  152​
NINETY-FOURTH SESSION​
Authored by Robbins, Nash, Engen, Repinski and Gander​01/22/2025​
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on State Government Finance and Policy​ 2.1 Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 16B.97, subdivision 3, is amended to read:​
2.2 Subd. 3.Discretionary powers.The commissioner director has the authority to:​
2.3 (1) review grants management practices and establish and enforce policy and procedure​
2.4improvements;​
2.5 (2) sponsor, support, and facilitate innovative and collaborative grants management​
2.6projects with public and private organizations;​
2.7 (3) review, recommend, and implement alternative strategies for grants management;​
2.8 (4) collect and disseminate information, issue reports relating to grants management,​
2.9and sponsor and conduct conferences and studies;​
2.10 (5) participate in conferences and other appropriate activities related to grants​
2.11management issues;​
2.12 (6) suspend or debar grantees from eligibility to receive state-issued grants for up to​
2.13three years for reasons specified in Minnesota Rules, part 1230.1150, subpart 2. A grantee​
2.14may obtain an administrative hearing pursuant to sections 14.57 to 14.62 before a suspension​
2.15or debarment is effective by filing a written request for hearing within 20 days of notification​
2.16of suspension or debarment;​
2.17 (7) establish offices for the purpose of carrying out grants governance, oversight, and​
2.18management; and​
2.19 (8) require granting agencies to submit grant solicitation documents for review prior to​
2.20issuance at dollar levels determined by the commissioner.​
2.21 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 16B.97, subdivision 4, is amended to read:​
2.22 Subd. 4.Duties.(a) The commissioner director shall:​
2.23 (1) create general grants management policies and procedures that are applicable to all​
2.24executive agencies. The commissioner director may approve exceptions to these policies​
2.25and procedures for particular grant programs. Exceptions shall expire or be renewed after​
2.26five years. Executive agencies shall retain management of individual grants programs,​
2.27provided that the director determines the executive agency is compliant with the requirements​
2.28of law related to grantmaking and grants management in administering its programs;​
2.29 (2) provide a central point of contact concerning statewide grants management policies​
2.30and, procedures, and requirements of law;​
2​Sec. 3.​
REVISOR SGS/MI 25-01447​12/17/24 ​ 3.1 (3) serve as a resource to executive agencies in such areas as training, evaluation,​
3.2collaboration, and best practices in grants management;​
3.3 (4) ensure grants management needs are considered in the development, upgrade, and​
3.4use of statewide administrative systems and leverage existing technology wherever possible;​
3.5 (5) oversee and approve future professional and technical service contracts and other​
3.6information technology spending related to executive agency grants management systems​
3.7and activities, including verifying, in consultation with the legislative auditor, that information​
3.8technology systems used by executive branch agencies in administering grant programs​
3.9meet the requirements of this section and section 16B.98;​
3.10 (6) provide a central point of contact for comments about executive agencies violating​
3.11statewide grants governance policies and about fraud and waste in grants processes;​
3.12 (7) forward received comments to the appropriate agency legislative auditor for further​
3.13action, and may follow up as necessary;​
3.14 (8) provide a single listing of all available executive agency competitive grant​
3.15opportunities and resulting grant recipients;​
3.16 (9) selectively review development and implementation of executive agency grants,​
3.17policies, and practices; and​
3.18 (10) selectively review executive agency compliance with best practices.;​
3.19 (11) in consultation with the legislative auditor, review executive agency compliance​
3.20with the requirements of law related to grantmaking and grants management;​
3.21 (12) review and approve or disapprove a grantee's request for waivers, deadline​
3.22extensions, or other variances from the terms of a written grant agreement; and​
3.23 (13) in consultation with the legislative auditor, provide a standardized form that granting​
3.24agencies may use to submit oversight reports to the governor and legislature regarding grant​
3.25activities, including details related to the number of grants awarded by the agency, how​
3.26each grant is being used, appropriate statistics demonstrating how the use of the grant​
3.27benefits the public, and specific details on the use of any funds retained by the granting​
3.28agency for costs associated with administering the grant.​
3.29 (b) No later than July 1, 2025, The commissioner may director must determine that​
3.30whether it is cost-effective for agencies to develop and use shared grants management​
3.31technology systems. This system would be governed under section 16E.01, subdivision 3,​
3.32paragraph (b). If the director determines that a shared grants management technology system​
3​Sec. 3.​
REVISOR SGS/MI 25-01447​12/17/24 ​ 4.1would not be cost-effective, the director must propose an alternative enterprise-wide reporting​
4.2system for grants management that allows for public accountability, transparency, and​
4.3information sharing across all agencies. To the extent practical, the director must work with​
4.4the commissioner of management and budget to build appropriate grants management​
4.5functionality into any new statewide accounting system developed for use by agencies.​
4.6 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 16B.97, subdivision 5, is amended to read:​
4.7 Subd. 5.Data classification.Data maintained by the commissioner director that identify​
4.8a person providing comments to the commissioner under subdivision 4, paragraph (a),​
4.9clauses (6) and (7), are private and nonpublic data but may be shared with the executive​
4.10agency that is the subject of the comments.​
4.11 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 16B.98, subdivision 4, is amended to read:​
4.12 Subd. 4.Reporting of violations.A state employee who discovers evidence of violation​
4.13of laws or rules governing grants is encouraged to must report the violation or suspected​
4.14violation to the employee's supervisor, the commissioner or the commissioner's designee​
4.15director of grants management and oversight, or the legislative auditor. The legislative​
4.16auditor shall report to the Legislative Audit Commission if there are multiple complaints​
4.17about the same agency. The auditor's report to the Legislative Audit Commission under this​
4.18section must disclose only the number and type of violations alleged. An employee making​
4.19a good faith report under this section has the protections provided for under section 181.932,​
4.20prohibiting the employer from discriminating against the employee.​
4.21 Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 16B.98, subdivision 5, is amended to read:​
4.22 Subd. 5.Creation and validity of grant agreements.(a) A grant agreement and​
4.23amendments are not valid and do not bind unless:​
4.24 (1) the grant agreement and amendments have been executed by the head of the agency​
4.25or a delegate who is party to the grant;​
4.26 (2) the grant agreement and amendments have been approved by the commissioner;​
4.27 (3) the accounting system shows an encumbrance for the amount of the grant in​
4.28accordance with policy approved by the commissioner except as provided in subdivision​
4.2911; and​
4​Sec. 6.​
REVISOR SGS/MI 25-01447​12/17/24 ​ 5.1 (4) the grant agreement and amendments include an effective date that references either​
5.2section 16C.05, subdivision 2, or 16B.98, subdivisions 5 and 7, as determined by the granting​
5.3agency.​
5.4 (b) The combined grant agreement and amendments must not exceed five years without​
5.5specific, written approval by the commissioner according to established policy, procedures,​
5.6and standards, or unless the commissioner determines that a longer duration is in the best​
5.7interest of the state.​
5.8 (c) A fully executed copy of the grant agreement with all amendments and other required​
5.9records relating to the grant must be kept on file at the granting agency for a time equal to​
5.10that required of grantees in subdivision 8.​
5.11 (d) Grant agreements must comply with policies established by the commissioner director​
5.12of grants management and oversight for minimum grant agreement standards and practices.​
5.13 (e) The attorney general may must periodically review and evaluate a sample of state​
5.14agency grants to ensure compliance with applicable laws.​
5.15 Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 16B.98, subdivision 6, is amended to read:​
5.16 Subd. 6.Grant administration.A granting agency shall diligently administer and​
5.17monitor any grant it has entered into. A granting agency must report to the commissioner​
5.18at any time at the commissioner's request on the status of any grant to which the agency is​
5.19a party. At a minimum, a granting agency must:​
5.20 (1) administer a grant utilizing a grants management technology system approved by​
5.21the director of grants management and oversight;​
5.22 (2) require each grantee to identify all grants the grantee has received or applied to​
5.23receive from an executive agency;​
5.24 (3) independently determine whether the grantee has previously received grants or​
5.25entered contracts with a state agency, record that information in the grants management​
5.26technology system, and review any outcomes reported by a state agency related to a grantee's​
5.27performance under a prior grant or contract;​
5.28 (4) identify a program manager for each grant and identify the program manager in the​
5.29grants management technology system;​
5.30 (5) collect appropriate documentation, as determined by the director of grants management​
5.31and oversight, sufficient to verify that providing a grant to a proposed grantee is reasonable​
5.32and appropriate given the grantee's level of financial health and sophistication, including​
5​Sec. 7.​
REVISOR SGS/MI 25-01447​12/17/24 ​ 6.1at a minimum, an audit report or IRS form 990, and the proposed grantee's balance sheets​
6.2from the most recent fiscal year or, if the proposed grant has a value of $500,000 or more,​
6.3the proposed grantee's balance sheets covering the most recent five fiscal years, and record​
6.4that information in the grants management technology system;​
6.5 (6) conduct either an unannounced or scheduled in-person meeting with a grantee, at​
6.6the grantee's offices or worksite, to verify that the grant is being used for its intended​
6.7purposes;​
6.8 (7) submit to the director of grants management and oversight for approval any request​
6.9made by a grantee for a waiver, deadline extension, or other variance from the terms of a​
6.10written grant agreement;​
6.11 (8) ensure that the job description of any employee of an agency with responsibilities​
6.12related to grantmaking or grants management includes those duties, that the employee is​
6.13properly and regularly trained on these duties, and that these duties are incorporated in the​
6.14annual review of the employee's job performance, and where appropriate, remedial action​
6.15is taken in the event an employee fails to adequately fulfill the duties;​
6.16 (9) subject to review and approval by the director of grants management and oversight,​
6.17in consultation with the legislative auditor, establish internal controls for conducting ongoing​
6.18oversight of grants administered by the agency, along with policies and procedures for​
6.19remedial action when these controls are not followed; and​
6.20 (10) using the standardized form established by the director of grants management and​
6.21oversight, submit an annual report to the governor and the legislative committees with​
6.22jurisdiction over the agency's budget detailing the agency's grant activity in the prior year.​
6.23 Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 16B.98, subdivision 7, is amended to read:​
6.24 Subd. 7.Grant payments.(a) Payments to the grantee may not be issued until the grant​
6.25agreement is fully executed. Encumbrances for grants issued by June 30 may be certified​
6.26for a period of one year beyond the year in which the funds were originally appropriated as​
6.27provided by section 16A.28, subdivision 6.​
6.28 (b) An executive agency must withhold payments on a grant if a grantee has not submitted​
6.29each required progress report, financial reconciliation, or other report required by the terms​
6.30of the grant agreement, or if the executive agency determines that the grantee no longer​
6.31qualifies to receive the grant.​
6.32 (c) An executive agency must not make final payment on a grant until it has received​
6.33all annual financial reconciliations required by the terms of the grant agreement, in addition​
6​Sec. 8.​
REVISOR SGS/MI 25-01447​12/17/24 ​ 7.1to a comprehensive reconciliation of all expenses, reimbursements, and other uses of the​
7.2grant funds that demonstrate to the granting agency that the grantee is prepared to receive​
7.3a final grant payment on the grant.​
7.4 Sec. 9. DIRECTOR OF GRANTS MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT;​
7.5TRANSITION.​
7.6 The commissioner must appoint a director of grants management and oversight as​
7.7required by this act no later than October 1, 2025. The commissioner must engage with the​
7.8public and private sector to recruit highly qualified applicants and make a final appointment​
7.9through an open and competitive process. The appointed director's responsibilities must​
7.10include the work and mission of the existing Office of Grants Management, in addition to​
7.11the new duties prescribed by this act.​
7​Sec. 9.​
REVISOR SGS/MI 25-01447​12/17/24 ​