Minnesota House Bill HF2004

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25

Caption

Permissible out-of-state billing for certain disability waiver services clarified.

Impact

The passage of HF2004 is expected to modify existing practices surrounding the funding and provision of disability services, specifically those involved in out-of-state situations. The bill directs the Commissioner of Human Services to propose amendments to the waiver plans by December 1, 2025. This proposal will include the inclusion of individualized home supports without training, respite, and night supervision in the definition of authorized services for eligible waiver participants. Such changes are vital in enhancing the flexibility of service provision, a factor that is particularly significant for families and individuals who may travel or pursue educational opportunities out of state.

Summary

House File 2004 (HF2004) is a legislative initiative in Minnesota focused on clarifying the permissible out-of-state billing for specific disability waiver services. The bill aims to provide a clearer framework for the billing of services related to home and community-based care, particularly for individuals who may require these services while temporarily out-of-state or when attending out-of-state postsecondary educational institutions. By establishing this clarity, the bill intends to ensure that individuals receiving disability services can maintain access to essential support irrespective of their location.

Contention

While HF2004 seeks to improve service access for individuals with disabilities, potential areas of contention may arise from the implementation details and the impacts on existing service infrastructure. Stakeholders may express concerns regarding the adequacy of support during the transitional phase and the capabilities of providers to meet the defined standards for out-of-state services. Additionally, discussions on funding implications and the administrative workload necessary to manage the out-of-state billing processes may lead to divergent opinions among legislators and advocacy groups focused on disability rights and services.