Minnesota 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF3193 Introduced / Bill

Filed 04/16/2025

                    1.1	A bill for an act​
1.2 relating to property taxation; tax increment financing; allowing an authority to​
1.3 stop payments after finding that a developer, contractor, or subcontractor has​
1.4 violated state or municipal labor law; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota​
1.5 Statutes, chapter 469.​
1.6BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:​
1.7 Section 1. [469.1767] REMEDIES FOR LABOR LAW VIOLATIONS.​
1.8 Subdivision 1.Remedies.If the municipality makes a finding, pursuant to the​
1.9requirements of subdivision 2, that a developer, contractor, or subcontractor violated state​
1.10or municipal labor laws in developing a project approved by the municipality, the authority​
1.11may, notwithstanding any contract, note, or agreement to the contrary, stop payments of​
1.12increment to a developer, property owner, or note holder for costs of activities incurred in​
1.13developing the project, including payments for any interest accrued through the financing​
1.14of such costs.​
1.15 Subd. 2.Public notice, hearing, and discussion required.(a) The municipality shall​
1.16make a finding of a labor law violation only after a public hearing thereon after published​
1.17notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least once not less than​
1.18ten days nor more than 30 days prior to the date of the hearing. The notice must include the​
1.19proposed findings to be adopted at the hearing.​
1.20 (b) A finding of a labor law violation must include a citation to the labor law found to​
1.21be violated and facts supporting the finding, including the dates, times, or locations of any​
1.22alleged violations.​
1​Section 1.​
REVISOR SS/RC 25-05355​04/01/25 ​
State of Minnesota​
This Document can be made available​
in alternative formats upon request​
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES​
H. F. No.  3193​
NINETY-FOURTH SESSION​
Authored by Coulter, Gomez, Norris and Pinto​04/21/2025​
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes​ 2.1 (c) Before the finding is adopted or at the hearing at which it is to be adopted, any​
2.2developer, property owner, or note holder connected with the project may file a written​
2.3objection with the clerk of the municipality.​
2.4 Subd. 3.Challenge in district court.(a) Within 30 days after the municipality makes​
2.5a finding under subdivision 2, any person or entity found to have violated a labor law may​
2.6bring suit for equitable relief or for damages. Within 30 days after the authority stops​
2.7payment under subdivision 1, any person or entity to whom payments are stopped may bring​
2.8suit for equitable relief or for damages.​
2.9 (b) A court hearing a challenge under paragraph (a) shall rule in favor of the challenger​
2.10if it finds either that the procedures set forth in subdivision 2 were not followed or that the​
2.11law cited in the finding was not violated.​
2.12 (c) The prevailing party in a suit filed under this subdivision is entitled to costs, including​
2.13reasonable attorney fees.​
2.14 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment and​
2.15applies to all districts for which the request for certification was made after the day following​
2.16final enactment.​
2​Section 1.​
REVISOR SS/RC 25-05355​04/01/25 ​