Missouri 2022 2022 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB1758 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 01/26/2022

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:3664H.02I Bill No.:HB 1758  Subject:Property, Real and Personal; State Departments; Counties; Cities, Towns, and 
Villages 
Type:Original  Date:January 26, 2022Bill Summary:This proposal relates to real property. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 3664H.02I 
Bill No. HB 1758  
Page 2 of 
January 26, 2022
NM:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 3664H.02I 
Bill No. HB 1758  
Page 3 of 
January 26, 2022
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Department of Mental Health and the Department of Public Safety’s 
Director’s Office each defer to the Office of Administration for the potential fiscal impact of 
this proposal. 
Officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assume this proposal would prohibit OA from 
purchasing or otherwise acquiring property on behalf of the State in a county where 20% or more 
of the total property is owned by the federal, state or local government, unless the transaction 
were approved by the county commission. OA-FMDC assumes that it would be the 
responsibility of OA-FMDC to make a determination about whether the limitation in this bill 
applies before acquiring property on behalf of the State.
In order for OA-FMDC to make a determination about whether the limitation in this bill applies, 
OA-FMDC would need to acquire current GIS parcel data from the county(ies) or through a third 
party vendor. It would not be feasible for OA-FMDC to make this determination without parcel 
data as not all Missouri counties have a publicly accessible GIS database or have search features 
that would make it practicable to collect this information from publicly available information. 
OA-FMDC estimates that it would cost anywhere $2,000 to $10,000 annually to acquire up-to-
date statewide parcel data from a vendor.
Assuming GIS parcel data is available, OA-FMDC estimates that it would take approximately 20 
hours per real estate transaction for an employee with GIS training to review the data and 
determine how many properties are government owned ($40 per hour x 20 hours = $800). It is 
assumed that OA-FMDC would purchase or acquire approximately two properties per year on 
behalf of the State, for a total impact of $1,600 for staff time. It is assumed that OA-FMDC can 
absorb this cost at this time. However, if OA does not have staff who have experience working 
with GIS data available to perform this work at the time a real estate transaction occurs, OA-
FMDC would need to contract with a title company or other vendor to perform this analysis. The 
cost of such contract is unknown. Therefore, the impact of this bill is $3,600 to unknown.
Officials from the University of Missouri System is unable to determine the percentage of real 
property in each county is government owned and whether or not our institution is close to the 
20% threshold; however, the proposed legislation could potentially negatively affect the 
University’s ability to acquire real property to drive its mission.
Officials from the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD)
impact MSD if the threshold of 20% ownership for the governmental entities referenced is 
reached in that it would delay the acquisition of property needed to complete our projects, many 
of which are time sensitive and being done to comply with state and federal regulations.  L.R. No. 3664H.02I 
Bill No. HB 1758  
Page 4 of 
January 26, 2022
NM:LR:OD
Officials from the University of Central Missouri
this proposal.
Oversight notes this proposal allows up to a 20% cap on owning real property within a county 
before requiring he county commission to adopt a resolution in support of further acquisitions. 
Currently, county commissions do not have this authority. Oversight assumes if this proposal 
were enacted and county commissions say “no”, it could impact a wide range of governments 
and/or political subdivisions attempting to acquire land for right-of-way, land for the building of 
new fire stations, parks, colleges and universities looking to expand, as well as, water and sewer 
district projects, etc. Oversight assumes County Commissions and affected agencies will come to 
agreements to allow necessary projects to be completed. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a $0 
fiscal impact for this proposal.
Officials from the Attorney General’s Office, the Office of Administration - Administrative 
Hearing Commission, the Office of Administration - Budget and PlanningDepartment 
of Commerce and Insurance, the Department of Economic Development, the Department of 
Elementary and Secondary Education, the Department of Higher Education and 
Workforce Development, the Department of Health and Senior Services, the Department of 
Natural Resources, the Department of Corrections, the Department of Labor and Industrial 
Relations, the Department of Revenue, the Department of Public Safety’s Division of 
Alcohol and Tobacco Control, Capitol Police, Fire SafetyMissouri Gaming Commission, 
Missouri National Guard, Missouri Highway Patrol, Missouri Veterans Commission and 
State Emergency Management Agency, the Department of Social Services, the Missouri 
Department of AgricultureMissouri Department of Conservation, the Missouri Ethics 
Commission, the Missouri Department of Transportation, the MoDOT & Patrol 
Employees’ Retirement System, the Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance FundOffice of 
the Secretary of StateOffice of the State Public Defender, the Office of the Governor
the Office of the State Auditor, the Office of the State Treasurer, the Missouri House of 
Representatives, the Joint Committee on Administrative RulesJoint Committee on 
Education, the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement, the Legislative Research, 
the Oversight Division, the Missouri Senate, the Missouri Lottery, the Missouri 
Consolidated Health Care Plan, the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, the 
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services, the Missouri State Employee's Retirement System, 
the Office of the State Courts Administrator and the State Tax Commission each assume the 
proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have 
any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note 
for these agencies.  
Officials from the City of Claycomo, the City of Freistatt, the City of Hughesville, the City of 
O’Fallon, the City of Springfield, the City of St. Louis, Boone CountyPhelps County 
Sheriff Department, the Kansas City Police Department, the Springfield Police Department, 
the St. Joseph Police Department, the St. Louis County Police Department, the Cole Camp 
Ambulance District, the Nodaway County Ambulance District, the City of Freistatt Utilities, 
the Hughesville Water/Wastewater District, the South River Drainage District, the Vernon  L.R. No. 3664H.02I 
Bill No. HB 1758  
Page 5 of 
January 26, 2022
NM:LR:OD
County PWSD #7, the Wayne County PWSD #2, the Hermann Area Hospital District, 
Missouri State University, St. Charles Community College and the Hancock Street Light 
District each assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. 
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero 
impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.  
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2023
(10 Mo.)
FY 2024FY 2025$0$0$0FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2023
(10 Mo.)
FY 2024FY 2025$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no direct fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of Administration – Facilities Management, Design and Construction
University of Missouri System
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
University of Central Missouri
Attorney General’s Office
Office of Administration
Administrative Hearing Commission
Budget and Planning
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Economic Development
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development
Department of Health and Senior Services L.R. No. 3664H.02I 
Bill No. HB 1758  
Page 6 of 
January 26, 2022
NM:LR:OD
Department of Mental Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Corrections
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Department of Revenue
Department of Public Safety
Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control
Capitol Police
Office of the Director
Fire Safety
Missouri Gaming Commission
Missouri National Guard
Missouri Highway Patrol
Missouri Veterans Commission
State Emergency Management Agency
Department of Social Services
Missouri Department of Agriculture
Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Ethics Commission
Missouri Department of Transportation
MoDOT & Patrol Employees’ Retirement System
Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund
Office of the Secretary of State
Office of the State Public Defender
Office of the Governor
Office of the State Auditor
Office of the State Treasurer
Missouri House of Representatives
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Joint Committee on Education
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Legislative Research
Oversight Division
Missouri Senate
Missouri Lottery
Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan
Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Missouri State Employee's Retirement System
Office of the State Courts Administrator
State Tax Commission
City of Claycomo
City of Freistatt
City of Hughesville L.R. No. 3664H.02I 
Bill No. HB 1758  
Page 7 of 
January 26, 2022
NM:LR:OD
City of O’Fallon
City of Springfield
City of St. Louis
Boone County
Phelps County Sheriff
Kansas City Police Department
Springfield Police Department
St. Joseph Police Department
St. Louis County Police Department
Cole Camp Ambulance District
Nodaway County Ambulance District
City of Freistatt Utilities
Hughesville Water/Wastewater District
South River Drainage District
Vernon County PWSD #7
Wayne County PWSD #2
Hermann Area Hospital District
Missouri State University
St. Charles Community College
Hancock Street Light District
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorJanuary 26, 2022January 26, 2022