Modifies the provision allowing law enforcement officers to use deadly force in certain circumstances and establishes a task force on the use of force
The reformation of deadly force provisions is expected to have significant implications for state law regarding law enforcement practices. It sets a clearer framework for police officers, outlining scenarios that justify the use of deadly force and ensuring that such actions are subject to scrutiny. Additionally, the bill establishes a task force within the Department of Public Safety that will focus on clarifying and assessing the use of force rules as they apply to law enforcement, particularly in jurisdictions with large populations. This task force will consist of various stakeholders, intending to balance between effective law enforcement and community safety.
House Bill 1828 modifies the existing provisions under which law enforcement officers may use deadly force. It repeals section 563.046 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri and enacts two new sections, which clarify the circumstances under which deadly force is deemed justifiable. Notably, it emphasizes that officers are justified in using physical force when they reasonably believe it is necessary to effect an arrest or prevent an escape, provided that the amount of force used is objectively reasonable based on the circumstances present at the time. This bill aims to provide guidance on the use of force, especially deadly force, enhancing accountability for law enforcement actions during arrests.
Despite its intentions, HB1828 has stirred different opinions among stakeholders. Supporters argue that the bill will protect officers by providing a clear legal framework while also ensuring a level of accountability to the public. Opponents, however, may raise concerns regarding potential overreach and the implications of using deadly force, particularly in situations involving unarmed individuals. The bill mandates that an officer using deadly force against an unarmed person must face immediate suspension pending investigation, a component that aims to hold officers accountable and address public concerns about police violence.
The provisions within HB1828 also introduce significant stipulations regarding the use of deadly force. Officers must provide identity and warning prior to employing deadly force, and they are only justified in using such force if they believe that the individual they are attempting to arrest poses an immediate threat, has committed a serious felony, or possesses a dangerous weapon. Moreover, the burden of proof is placed on the defendant asserting justification under this law, which could impact criminal defense strategies in cases involving police encounters.