COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:4784H.02P Bill No.:Perfected HCS for HB 2218 Subject:Saint Louis City; Property, Real and Personal Type:Original Date:April 6, 2022Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to the Municipal Land
Reutilization Law.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on General
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other State
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 4784H.02P
Bill No. Perfected HCS for HB 2218
Page 2 of
April 6, 2022
NM:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on All Federal
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 4784H.02P
Bill No. Perfected HCS for HB 2218
Page 3 of
April 6, 2022
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§§59.310, 92.720, 92.740, 92.750, 92.760, 92.765, 92.770, 92.775, 92.810, 92.815, 92.817,
92.825, 92.835, 92.840, 92.852, 92.855, & 442.130 – Certain Property Regulations
In response to a previous version, officials from the Department of Labor and Industrial
Relations, the Department of Revenue, the Office of the State Courts AdministratorSt.
Louis County Police Department and the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District each
assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight
does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in
the fiscal note for these agencies.
SEQ CHAPTER \h 1Officials from the City of St. Louis and the St. Louis Metropolitan
Police Department did not respond to Oversight’s request for fiscal impact for this proposal.
House Amendment 1 – Titling Amendment
Oversight notes this amendment will have no fiscal impact on the proposal.
House Amendment 2 (§436.337) – Home Inspections
In response to similar legislation from this year, part of Perfected HCS/HB 1682, officials from
the City of ClaycomoCity of Springfield each assumed the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
House Amendment 3 (§535.012) – Evictions
In response to similar legislation from this year, part of Perfected HCS/HB 1682, officials from
the Office of the State Courts Administrator, the Attorney General’s Office, the City of
Claycomo and City of Springfield each assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on
their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary.
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
House Amendment 4 (§442.404) – Homeowners’ Associations and Sale Signs
In response to similar legislation from this year, part of Perfected HCS/HB 1682, officials from
the City of ClaycomoCity of Springfield each assumed the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies. L.R. No. 4784H.02P
Bill No. Perfected HCS for HB 2218
Page 4 of
April 6, 2022
NM:LR:OD
Bill as a Whole
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance, the Department of Economic
Development, the Missouri Department of Transportation, the State Tax Commission, the
City of Kansas City and the City of O’Fallon each assume the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities and counties were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System
database is available upon request.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2023
(10 Mo.)
FY 2024FY 2025$0$0$0FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2023
(10 Mo.)
FY 2024FY 2025$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
There could be an impact to landlords who operate small businesses as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no direct fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Economic Development
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Department of Revenue
Missouri Department of Transportation L.R. No. 4784H.02P
Bill No. Perfected HCS for HB 2218
Page 5 of
April 6, 2022
NM:LR:OD
State Tax Commission
Office of the State Courts Administrator
St. Louis County Police Department
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
City of Claycomo
City of Springfield
Attorney General’s Office
City of Kansas City
City of O’Fallon
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorApril 6, 2022April 6, 2022