Missouri House Bill HB2255

Missouri 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/22
• Refer: 1/20/22
• Report Pass: 3/3/22
• Refer: 3/3/22
• Report Pass: 3/10/22

Caption

Requires a parent, caretaker relative, putative father, or identified noncustodial parent to cooperate with the child support program to be eligible for SNAP

Impact

The implementation of HB 2255 could lead to significant changes in how state laws regarding SNAP eligibility are structured. By mandating cooperation with child support programs, the bill is expected to increase the number of parents who fulfill their financial responsibilities. This might lead to an increase in child support collections, which can positively affect the financial stability of households relying on SNAP benefits. Additionally, it may deter some individuals from applying for SNAP if they are unable or unwilling to comply with the child support stipulations.

Summary

House Bill 2255 requires that parents, caretaker relatives, putative fathers, or identified noncustodial parents must cooperate with the child support program in order to be eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This bill seeks to strengthen the enforcement of child support obligations and ensure that families receiving SNAP are actively participating in the support program. By tying SNAP eligibility to child support collaboration, the bill aims to promote accountability and responsibility among parents regarding their children's welfare.

Contention

There are likely to be points of contention surrounding this bill, particularly related to how it affects low-income families. Critics may argue that requiring cooperation with child support programs could dissuade eligible parents from seeking assistance due to fear of penalties or increased scrutiny over their personal situations. Advocates for low-income families might assert that the bill could unwittingly create barriers to receiving vital food assistance for some families in crisis, particularly those with complex family dynamics. The way that the bill is enforced and monitored could also spark debates about fairness and additional burdens placed on struggling families.