COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:3896S.10P Bill No.:Perfected SS#3 for SCS for SB 758 Subject:Office of Administration; Contracts and Contractors; Political Subdivisions;
Public Officers; State Departments
Type:Original Date:April 5, 2022Bill Summary:This proposal modifies various provisions relating to bidding procedures for
certain public projects for facilities.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025General Revenue
Fund*
$100,000 - $300,000$100,000 - $300,000$100,000 - $300,000Total Estimated Net
Effect on General
Revenue
$100,000 - $300,000$100,000 - $300,000$100,000 - $300,000
*Represents a range of savings from being allowed to advertise on a website instead of a
newspaper.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other State
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 3896S.10P
Bill No. Perfected SS#3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 2 of
April 5, 2022
KC:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on All Federal
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☒ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 3896S.10P
Bill No. Perfected SS#3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 3 of
April 5, 2022
KC:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Due to time constraints, Oversight was unable to receive some agency responses in a timely
manner and performed limited analysis. Oversight has presented this fiscal note on the best
current information that we have or on information regarding a similar bill(s). Upon the receipt
of agency responses, Oversight will review to determine if an updated fiscal note should be
prepared and seek approval to publish a new fiscal note.
Section 8.250 – Public Contracts
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of Administration - Facilities
Management, Design and Construction (OA-FMDC) stated this section of the proposal would
permit OA-FMDC to place invitations to bid for construction projects on its website or
MissouriBUYS for a period of ten days or more rather than advertising in the newspaper. On
average, for the period from FY19-FY21, FMDC spent $101,990 per year on newspaper
advertising. However, this number is lower than in the past given that many construction projects
have been on hold during this timeframe. FMDC’s advertising costs averaged around $300,000
per year in the past when more capital improvement projects were being completed. FMDC
expects a saving of $100,000 to $300,000 per year from this change.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect the
estimated savings provided by OA-FMDC.
Section 8.690 – Public project delivery methods
In response to a previous version of the bill, OA-FMDC stated this would have given OA-
FMDC the ability to utilize the construction manager-at-risk and design-build procurement
methods for design and construction of capital improvement projects. This bill would have given
the state the ability to utilize additional modern, industry standard procurement tools for design
and construction that are currently used in the private sector as well as by the political
subdivisions of the state. This bill would have given the state additional flexibility for the design
and construction of state projects, which FMDC anticipated would increase efficiency and
reduce risk, administrative costs, and construction timeframes for some projects. This could have
been particularly important given the number of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) projects
that the state will likely need to complete in the coming years.
This bill would have required OA-FMDC to establish new procurement methods and procedures,
and create new contract documents for construction management-at-risk and design-build
procurement. FMDC estimates that this would have taken approximately 1,500 hours of contract
staff time ($37 per hour totaling $55,500) and an additional 250 hours of Legal Counsel time L.R. No. 3896S.10P
Bill No. Perfected SS#3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 4 of
April 5, 2022
KC:LR:OD
($42 per hour totaling $10,500). FMDC anticipates that these impacts could have been absorbed
with existing staff and resources.
Officials from the OA-FMDC assume the cost of this section of the proposal can be absorbed
with existing staff and resources. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary.
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these sections.
OA-FMDC also stated that while there would be initial effort by FMDC’s Contracts Unit and
the OA legal team in the first year or two of implementation, FMDC anticipates that these costs
would be offset by time savings within its Project Management Unit and Construction
Administration Unit. This would also help FMDC manage capacity issues if a larger number of
projects need to be completed in a shorter time frame than what FMDC typically experiences.
For example, FMDC currently has the capacity to manage around $700 million in projects over a
four-year period or $350 million in a two-year period with existing Project Management and
Construction Administration staff. If FMDC receives funding for several large projects that bring
its project total to $850 million, FMDC would need an estimated $3 million for additional staff
over the next 4 years. However, because the increased workload is short-term in nature, it would
be beneficial for FMDC to have the ability to pay a contractor for these services rather than
hiring additional staff or delaying project completion. The actual fiscal impact of this bill is
unknown as it will depend upon a number of factors including the number and type of projects
FMDC receives funding for, construction prices, and whether these new procurement methods
are utilized consistently.
In response to a previous version of the bill, officials from the Department of Public Safety -
Missouri National Guard (MONG) stated that the biggest fiscal impact to MONG would be if
Office of Administration - Facilities Management, Design and Construction (FMDC) could not
support a Design-Bid-Build project on the required time-line. MONG will have the option to
utilize Design-Build which will potentially allow MONG to obligate funds that might otherwise
expire. Other potential impacts could include getting projects completed quicker, allowing
termination of leases, or reducing cost of construction.
Reference: Sanvido, V., & Konchar, M. (1999), Selecting Project Delivery Systems:
Comparing Design-Build, Design-Bid-Build, and Construction Management at Risk.
Design-Build versus Design-Bid-Build resulted in 6.1% lower unit cost at a 33.5% faster
delivery speed; and
Bid-Build and 13.3% faster delivery speed.
There is no inherent cost in having these additional options (as long as they are just options).
These options could enhance MONG’s ability to execute projects within the life-span of Federal
funds. L.R. No. 3896S.10P
Bill No. Perfected SS#3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 5 of
April 5, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) state this proposal modifies various
provisions relating to public contracts. It amends the language in chapter 8 (dealing with public
construction contracts) and chapter 34 (public procurement), which apply to the department's
procurement practices. The bill removes the requirement to post bid opportunities in the
newspaper and allows the publication of notice to appear on the public entity's website. The bill
also amends the requirements for bidding manager-as-agent and design-build construction
contracts. Finally, the bill changes the language of 34.100 to allow the commissioner of OA to
delegate single feasible source authority to an agency for contracts totaling $10,000 and below,
instead of $5,000 and below.
There is a potential unknown cost savings, as these changes could speed up the process for
construction and construction projects, as well as potentially increase the efficiency of the
procurement and construction processes.
Officials from the Office of Administration - Budget and Planning state since there is a
"Guaranteed Maximum Price" set when using a Construction Manager-At-Risk model, there
could be some cost savings for state projects utilizing this method since the contractor assumes
the liability if there are overrunning costs. Similarly, the design-build model could produce cost-
savings given the potential for increased efficiency working through one contractor instead of
several.
Oversight assumes there would be some positive benefit to the state as a result of modifying
various provisions relating to public contracts and public procurement methods in this proposal;
however, Oversight notes the language in the proposal is permissive in nature and therefore will
not reflect these benefits in the fiscal note.
Bill as a whole
Officials from the Department of Economic DevelopmentDepartment of Higher
Education and Workforce Development, the Department of Health and Senior Services the
Department of Natural Resources, the Department of Corrections, the Department of
Revenue, the Department of Public Safety (Capitol Police Alcohol & Tobacco Control, Fire
Safety, Gaming Commission, Missouri Highway Patrol Missouri National Guard, State
Emergency Management Agency), the Office of the Governor, the Missouri Department of
Transportation, the Missouri Lottery Commission, the Missouri Consolidated Health Care
Plan, the Department of Agriculture, the Missouri Department of Conservation, the
Missouri Department of Conservation, the Missouri Ethics Commission, the Office of
Prosecution Services, the Office of Administration (Administrative Hearing Commission)
the Missouri Senate the Office of the State Public Defender, the Missouri House of
Representatives, the Office of the State Auditor, and the State Tax Commission each assume
the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations for this proposal. L.R. No. 3896S.10P
Bill No. Perfected SS#3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 6 of
April 5, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Officials from the Kansas City and St. Louis Budget Division
have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information
to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these
agencies.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a
direct fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note for these agencies.
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance, the Department of Mental
Health, the Department of Public Safety – Office of the Director and the Department of
Social Services defer to the Office of Administration for the potential fiscal impact of this
proposal.
In response to a previous version, officials from the Department of Elementary and Secondary
Education and the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations each assumed the proposal
would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any
information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for
these agencies.
In response to a previous version, officials from the City of Springfield assumed the proposal
will have no fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for this city.
Officials from the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules assume this proposal is not
anticipated to cause a fiscal impact beyond its current appropriation.
Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) note many bills considered by the
General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and
regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain
amount of normal activity resulting from each year's legislative session. The fiscal impact for
this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $5,000. The SOS recognizes that
this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet
these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed by the
General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the
office can sustain with its core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves the right to request funding
for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a
review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities, counties, colleges and universities were requested to respond to this
proposed legislation but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri
Legislative Information System database is available upon request. L.R. No. 3896S.10P
Bill No. Perfected SS#3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 7 of
April 5, 2022
KC:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2023
(10 Mo.)
FY 2024FY 2025GENERAL REVENUE FUNDSavings – OA §8.250 p.3
Website (electronic) instead of
newspaper advertising
$100,000-
$300,000
$100,000-
$300,000
$100,000-
$300,000
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO
THE GENERAL REVENUE FUND
$100,000-
$300,000
$100,000-
$300,000
$100,000-
$300,000
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2023
(10 Mo.)
FY 2024FY 2025$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This proposal modifies various provisions relating to bidding procedures for
certain public projects for facilities.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Economic Development
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development
Department of Health and Senior Services
Department of Mental Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Corrections
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Department of Revenue
Department of Public Safety L.R. No. 3896S.10P
Bill No. Perfected SS#3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 8 of
April 5, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Department of Social Services
Office of the Governor
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Missouri Lottery Commission
Legislative Research
Oversight Division
Missouri Department of Agriculture
Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Ethics Commission
Missouri House of Representatives
Missouri Department of Transportation
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Office of Administration
Facilities Management, Design and Construction
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of the State Auditor
Missouri Senate
Office of the Secretary of State
Office of the State Public Defender
State Tax Commission
City of Springfield
Kansas City
St. Louis Budget Division
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorApril 5, 2022April 5, 2022