COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:3896H.12C Bill No.:HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758 Subject:Business and Commerce; Economic Development; Economic Development,
Department Of
Type:Original Date:April 27, 2022Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to state programs for businesses.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025General Revenue
Fund*
$100,000 - $300,000
or (Unknown)
$100,000 - $300,000
or (Unknown)
$100,000 - $300,000
or (Unknown)
Total Estimated Net
Effect on General
Revenue
$100,000 - $300,000
or (Unknown)
$100,000 - $300,000
or (Unknown)
$100,000 - $300,000
or (Unknown)
*§8.250 - Represents a range of savings from being allowed to advertise on a website instead of
a newspaper.
*§620.803 - Oversight notes that Section 620.803, allows for a new type of service within the
Missouri One Start Program – ‘recruitment services’ provided by the Missouri employers.
Oversight assumes the amount could reach the $250,000 threshold in GR transfers into the
Missouri One Start Job Development Fund.
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 2 of
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025MISSOURI ONE
START
COMMUNITY
COLLEGE NEW
JOB TRAINING
FUND (0563)
$0
(Unknown) $0
MISSOURI ONE
START
COMMUNITY
COLLEGE NEW
JOB RETENTION
TRAINING FUND
(717)
$0
(Unknown) $0
MISSOURI ONE
START
COMMUNITY
COLLEGE
TRAINING FUND
$0UnknownUnknownMISSOURI ONE
START JOB
DEVELOPMENT
FUND (0600)*
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other State
Funds
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
*§620.803- Oversight notes that Section 620.803 allows for a new type of tax credit for the
Recruitment Services provided by the Missouri employers. The Development Fund is the only
fund receiving money from GR.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on All Federal
Funds $0$0$0 L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 3 of
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Total Estimated Net
Effect on FTE 000
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☒ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 4 of
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Due to time constraints, Oversight was unable to receive some agency responses in a timely
manner and performed limited analysis. Oversight has presented this fiscal note on the best
current information that we have or on information regarding a similar bill(s). Upon the receipt
of agency responses, Oversight will review to determine if an updated fiscal note should be
prepared and seek approval to publish a new fiscal note.
Section 8.250 – Public Contracts
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of Administration - Facilities
Management, Design and Construction (OA-FMDC) stated this section of the proposal would
permit OA-FMDC to place invitations to bid for construction projects on its website or
MissouriBUYS for a period of ten days or more rather than advertising in the newspaper. On
average, for the period from FY19-FY21, FMDC spent $101,990 per year on newspaper
advertising. However, this number is lower than in the past given that many construction projects
have been on hold during this timeframe. FMDC’s advertising costs averaged around $300,000
per year in the past when more capital improvement projects were being completed. FMDC
expects a saving of $100,000 to $300,000 per year from this change.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect the
estimated savings provided by OA-FMDC.
Section 8.690 – Public project delivery methods
In response to a previous version of the bill, OA-FMDC stated this would have given OA-
FMDC the ability to utilize the construction manager-at-risk and design-build procurement
methods for design and construction of capital improvement projects. This bill would have given
the state the ability to utilize additional modern, industry standard procurement tools for design
and construction that are currently used in the private sector as well as by the political
subdivisions of the state. This bill would have given the state additional flexibility for the design
and construction of state projects, which FMDC anticipated would increase efficiency and
reduce risk, administrative costs, and construction timeframes for some projects. This could have
been particularly important given the number of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) projects
that the state will likely need to complete in the coming years.
This bill would have required OA-FMDC to establish new procurement methods and procedures,
and create new contract documents for construction management-at-risk and design-build
procurement. FMDC estimates that this would have taken approximately 1,500 hours of contract
staff time ($37 per hour totaling $55,500) and an additional 250 hours of Legal Counsel time
($42 per hour totaling $10,500). FMDC anticipates that these impacts could have been absorbed
with existing staff and resources. L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 5 of
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Officials from the OA-FMDC assumed the cost of this section of the proposal can be absorbed
with existing staff and resources. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary.
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these sections.
OA-FMDC also stated that while there would be initial effort by FMDC’s Contracts Unit and
the OA legal team in the first year or two of implementation, FMDC anticipates that these costs
would be offset by time savings within its Project Management Unit and Construction
Administration Unit. This would also help FMDC manage capacity issues if a larger number of
projects need to be completed in a shorter time frame than what FMDC typically experiences.
For example, FMDC currently has the capacity to manage around $700 million in projects over a
four-year period or $350 million in a two-year period with existing Project Management and
Construction Administration staff. If FMDC receives funding for several large projects that bring
its project total to $850 million, FMDC would need an estimated $3 million for additional staff
over the next 4 years. However, because the increased workload is short-term in nature, it would
be beneficial for FMDC to have the ability to pay a contractor for these services rather than
hiring additional staff or delaying project completion. The actual fiscal impact of this bill is
unknown as it will depend upon a number of factors including the number and type of projects
FMDC receives funding for, construction prices, and whether these new procurement methods
are utilized consistently.
In response to a previous version, officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) stated
this proposal modifies various provisions relating to public contracts. It amends the language in
chapter 8 (dealing with public construction contracts) and chapter 34 (public procurement),
which apply to the department's procurement practices. The bill removes the requirement to post
bid opportunities in the newspaper and allows the publication of notice to appear on the public
entity's website. The bill also amends the requirements for bidding manager-as-agent and design-
build construction contracts. Finally, the bill changes the language of 34.100 to allow the
commissioner of OA to delegate single feasible source authority to an agency for contracts
totaling $10,000 and below, instead of $5,000 and below.
There is a potential unknown cost savings, as these changes could speed up the process for
construction and construction projects, as well as potentially increase the efficiency of the
procurement and construction processes.
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of Administration - Budget and
Planning stated since there is a "Guaranteed Maximum Price" set when using a Construction
Manager-At-Risk model, there could be some cost savings for state projects utilizing this method
since the contractor assumes the liability if there are overrunning costs. Similarly, the design-
build model could produce cost-savings given the potential for increased efficiency working
through one contractor instead of several.
Oversight assumes there would be some positive benefit to the state as a result of modifying
various provisions relating to public contracts and public procurement methods in this proposal; L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 6 of
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
however, Oversight notes the language in the proposal is permissive in nature and therefore will
not reflect these benefits in the fiscal note.
§311.028 – Ozark Highlands spirits
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HCS for HB 2621), officials from the
Department of Economic DevelopmentDepartment of Natural Resources, and the
Department of Public Safety - Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control each assumed the
proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for this section.
§§620.800 - 620.2475 – Missouri One Start Program
Officials from the Department of Revenue (DOR) assume the proposal stops the Missouri One
Start Community College New Jobs Training Fund and the Missouri One Start Community
College Job Retention Training Fund and replaces them with the Missouri One Start Community
College Training Fund. This fund will receive both the new and retained job credits. DOR is
required to develop new forms for the reporting of these credits. The creation of the new form is
estimated at $10,000.
Oversight notes DOR is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of activity each
year. Oversight assumes DOR could absorb the costs related to this proposal. If multiple bills
pass which require additional staffing and duties at substantial costs, DOR could request funding
through the appropriation process.
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HCS for HB 2418), officials from the Office of
Administration – Budget & Planning (B&P) assumed if more projects utilize the training
programs, these projects could also apply for other tax credits. If more tax credits are issued,
there could be an unknown decrease in General Revenue. Conversely, to the extent, this proposal
encourages other economic activity, General and Total State Revenue may be impacted, but
B&P cannot estimate the induced revenues.
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HCS for HB 2418), officials from the
Department of Economic Development (DED) assumed the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their organization.
Oversight, through e-mail conversation with DED in response to the similar proposal, received
additional information with explanation as follows:
Section 620.803, RSMo, adds the definition of “recruitment services” to the Missouri One Start
Job Development Fund program. This is a service currently offered with the funds appropriated
to Missouri One Start to assist companies with their hiring needs. Adding the recruitment L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 7 of
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
definition solidifies this service as a core component of the Missouri One Start program. This
will not be an increase in funds to the program, but rather an additional core service offered
within the funds appropriated to Missouri One Start. This program is funded through a GR
transfer to the Missouri One Start Job Development Fund.
Section 620.809, RSMo, creates a new Fund, the “Missouri One Start Community College
Training Fund” that will start July 1, 2023. This fund will combine two current funds, the MOS
Community College New Jobs Training Program (NJTP) and the MOS Community College Job
Retention Training Program (JRTP) into one new training fund. The eligibility criteria for the
NJTP and JRTP will remain the same. With appropriation authority for one combined fund
instead of two separate appropriations–one for new jobs training projects and one for retained
jobs training projects–Missouri One Start will have flexibility as between the two types of
projects in any fiscal year. The source of the funds will remain unchanged. It comes from
diverting a portion of the employer withholdings taxes (roughly 2%) on the new/retained jobs
approved within the training projects. DOR diverts the withholding taxes into the respective
fund. DED, pursuant to appropriations, pays the diverted funds to the company’s designated
training account established by the community college. The local community college will
reimburse approved training expenditures to the company from the designated account.
Expenditure Table by Fund
FY
NJTP
Appropriation
Authority
NJTP Expended
JRTP
Appropriation
Authority
JRTP Expended
17$16M$4,379,900.75$10M$6,028,757.0218$16M$5,600,210.89$10M$3,520,566.2019$16M$4,714,604.03$10M$2,780,863.3720$16M$3,674,337.44$11M$2,905,596.5021$16M$7,153,984.97$11M$6,795,308.91
Oversight notes Section 620.803.1 states: The department, specified as DED under the proposal
language, shall establish a "Missouri One Start Program" to assist companies with recruitment
services. Furthermore, Section 620.806.3 states: Funds in the Missouri One Start Job
Development Fund shall be appropriated, for recruitment services.
Oversight notes that the “recruitment services” allows employers to receive potentially more
credits paid by the Missouri One Start Development Fund. Missouri One Start Development fund
receives funds directly from the general revenue fund. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a range
from $0 (no additional employees are being recruited beyond the current recruitment levels
already being paid for) to Unknown reduction to the GR (additional employees are being
recruited beyond current levels and more GR funds are being transferred into the Job
Development Fund where less money collected through withholding are now being diverted to
the Missouri One Start Development Fund). L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 8 of
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Oversight notes that average expenditure per worker, from Missouri One Start Job Development
Fund, totaled $322.52 ($7,108,352/22,040) in FY 2017- FY 2019 period. Additionally, there
were more than 22,040 workers helped throughout the same period. Oversight notes it would
take only 775 existing or additional workers to reach $250,000 in spending due to the new
Recruitment Program participation. Therefore, it is probable that the GR will have an additional
expenditure that reaches over the $250,000 threshold.
Oversight notes that the Missouri One Start Community College Training Fund is replacing
Missouri One Start Community College New Jobs Training Fund and the Missouri One Start
Community College Job Retention Training Fund.
Oversight notes the proposal specifies the Missouri One Start Community College New Jobs
Training Fund and the Missouri One Start Community College Job Retention Training Fund both
shall receive withholding credits from DOR until June 30, 2023. All the unobligated credits
received on and after July 1, 2023, shall be transferred to the new fund, Missouri One Start
Community College Training Fund, created by the proposal. Therefore, Oversight will show an
unknown positive amount impact to the Missouri One Start Community College Training Fund
beginning FY 2024 and forward.
Lastly, will show Unknown amount (unobligated funds) being transferred from
Missouri One Start Community College New Jobs Training Fund and the Missouri One Start
Community College Job Retention Training Fund into the Missouri One Start Community
College Training Fund beginning FY 2024.
For informational purpose, Oversight included all actual expenditures under all three programs
below: L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 9 of
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Source: https://oa.mo.gov/sites/default/files/FY_2021_DED_Budget_Request_Gov_Rec.pdf
Oversight excluded FY 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID-19 participations (fluctuations) within
any of the programs under the proposal.
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HCS for HB 2418), officials from the Office of
Administration, the Office of Administration – Administrative Hearing Commission, the
Missouri Department of Transportation, the Department of Elementary and Secondary
Education each assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organizations.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for these agencies for these sections.
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HCS for HB 2418), officials from the
University of Missouri System and the Missouri State University both assumed the proposal
will have no fiscal impact on their organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for those agencies for
these sections.
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HCS for HB 2418), officials from the City of
Kansas City and the City of Springfield both assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for those cities.
F
Y 2017
F
Y 2018
F
Y 2019
M
issouri One Start Job Development
F
und (0600)
A
ctual Expenditures
1
1,175,945
$
4
,497,242
$
5
,651,870
$
C
ompanies Assisted
3
28
$
1
48
$
1
97
$
W
orkers Trained
3
1,003
1
6,666
1
8,451
M
issouri One Start Community College
N
ew Jobs Training Program (0563)
A
ctual Expenditures
4
,379,901
$
5
,600,211
$
4
,714,604
$
C
ompanies Assisted
1
5
1
6
1
2
W
orkers Trained
4
,923
5
,990
5
,720
A
nnual Cap
1
6,000,000
$
1
6,000,000
$
1
60,000,000
$
M
issouri One Start Community College
J
ob Retention Training Program (717)
A
ctual Expenditures
9
,028,757
$
3
,520,566
$
2
,780,863
$
C
ompanies Assisted
1
7
9 1
2
W
orkers Trained
6
,212
3
,957
4
,634
A
nnual Cap
1
0,000,000
$
1
0,000,000
$
1
0,000,000
$
L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 10 of 15
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Bill as a whole
Officials from the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development, the
Department of Public Safety – Capitol Police, Gaming Commission, Missouri National
Guard, State Emergency Management Agency, the Missouri Department of Agriculture
the Missouri Lottery Commission, the Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan, the
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services, the State Tax Commission, the Office of the State
Treasurer, the Office of Legislative Research, the Oversight Division and the Missouri
Senate each assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a previous version, officials from the Department of Economic Development,
the Department of Health and Senior Services the Department of Natural Resources, the
Department of Corrections, the Department of Revenue the Department of Public Safety
(Capitol Police, Alcohol & Tobacco Control, Fire Safety, Missouri Highway Patrolthe
Office of the Governor, the Missouri Department of Transportation, the Missouri
Department of Conservation, the Missouri Department of Conservation, the Missouri
Ethics Commission, the Office of Prosecution Services, the Office of Administration
(Administrative Hearing Commission), the Office of the State Public Defender, the Missouri
House of Representatives and the Office of the State Auditor each assumed the proposal will
have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations for this proposal.
Officials from Claycomo assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for the City of Claycomo.
In response to a previous version, officials from Springfield, Kansas City and St. Louis Budget
Division each assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a
direct fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note for these agencies.
Officials from the Department of Mental Health defer to the Office of Administration for the
potential fiscal impact of this proposal.
In response to a previous version, officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance
the Department of Public Safety – Office of the Director and the Department of Social
Services
SEQ CHAPTER \h 1 L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 11 of 15
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
In response to a previous version, officials from the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
assume this proposal is not anticipated to cause a fiscal impact beyond its current appropriation.
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS)
noted many bills considered by the General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring
agencies to submit rules and regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core
funding to handle a certain amount of normal activity resulting from each year's legislative
session. The fiscal impact for this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than
$5,000. The SOS recognizes that this is a small amount and does not expect that additional
funding would be required to meet these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many
such bills may be passed by the General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs
may be in excess of what the office can sustain with its core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves
the right to request funding for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should
the need arise based on a review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities, counties, colleges and universities were requested to respond to this
proposed legislation but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri
Legislative Information System database is available upon request. L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 12 of 15
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2023
(10 Mo.)
FY 2024FY 2025GENERAL REVENUE FUNDSavings – OA §8.250 p.3
Website (electronic) instead of
newspaper advertising
$100,000-
$300,000
$100,000-
$300,000
$100,000-
$300,000
Cost – §620.806.3 - new ‘Recruitment
Program’ – revenues being diverted
into the Missouri One Start
Development Fund (p.6-9)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO
THE GENERAL REVENUE FUND
$100,000-
$300,000 or
(Unknown)
$100,000-
$300,000 or
(Unknown)
$100,000-
$300,000 or
(Unknown)
MISSOURI ONE START
COMMUNITY COLLEGE NEW
JOB TRAINING FUND (0563)
Revenue Decline – §620.809.4-
Unobligated funds flowing to the new
fund (p. 6-9)
$0
(Unknown) $0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
THE MISSOURI ONE START
COMMUNITY COLLEGE FUND
$0(Unknown)$0
MISSOURI ONE START
COMMUNITY COLLEGE NEW
JOB RETENTION TRAINING
FUND (717) L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 13 of 15
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Revenue Decline – §620.809.4
Unobligated fund flowing to the new
fund (p. 6-9)
$0(Unknown) $0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
THE MISSOURI ONE START
COMMUNITY COLLEGE JOB
RETENTION TRAINIING FUND
$0(Unknown)$0
MISSOURI ONE START JOB
DEVELOPMENT FUND (0600)
Revenue Gain – §620.806.3 – payment
for the Recruitment Program from GR
(p. 6-9)
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
THE MISSOURI ONE START JOB
DEVELOPMENT FUND
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
MISSOURI ONE START
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
TRAINING FUND
Revenue Gain – §620.809.3- Money
flowing from both funds (p. 6-9)
$0UnknownUnknownNET ESTIMATED EFFECT ON
THE MISSOURI ONE START
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
TRAINING FUND
$0UnknownUnknown
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2023
(10 Mo.)
FY 2024FY 2025$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 14 of 15
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Small businesses that make or sell Ozark Highland liquor could be impacted by this proposal.
Some of the small businesses would be allow to obtain tax credits associated with training, new
job creation, and recruitment, and as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This proposal modifies provisions relating to state programs for businesses.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Economic Development
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development
Department of Health and Senior Services
Department of Mental Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Corrections
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Department of Revenue
Department of Public Safety
Department of Social Services
Office of the Governor
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Missouri Lottery Commission
Legislative Research
Oversight Division
Missouri Department of Agriculture
Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Ethics Commission
Missouri House of Representatives
Missouri Department of Transportation
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Office of Administration
Facilities Management, Design and Construction
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of the State Auditor
Missouri Senate
Office of the Secretary of State L.R. No. 3896H.12C
Bill No. HCS for SS No. 3 for SCS for SB 758
Page 15 of 15
April 27, 2022
KC:LR:OD
Office of the State Public Defender
State Tax Commission
City of Springfield
Kansas City
St. Louis Budget Division
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorApril 27, 2022April 27, 2022