Missouri 2023 2023 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB1185 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:2416H.01I Bill No.:HB 1185  Subject:Retirement Systems and Benefits - General; Retirement - State; State Employees; 
Employees - Employers 
Type:Original  Date:March 27, 2023Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to Missouri Department of 
Transportation and Highway Patrol Employees' Retirement System and 
Missouri State Employees' Retirement System. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 2416H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1185  
Page 2 of 
March 27, 2023
JLH:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 2416H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1185  
Page 3 of 
March 27, 2023
JLH:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement (JCPER) state this 
proposal has no direct fiscal impact to the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement. The 
JCPER’s review of this legislation indicates that its provisions may create a “substantial 
proposed change” in future plan benefits as defined in section 105.660 (10). It is impossible to 
accurately determine the fiscal impact of this legislation without an actuarial cost statement 
prepared in accordance with section 105.665.  
Pursuant to section 105.670, an actuarial cost statement must be filed with the Chief Clerk of the 
House of Representatives, the Secretary of the Senate, and the Joint Committee on Public 
Employee Retirement as public information for at least five legislative days prior to final 
passage.
Current Status of MOSERS:
As of June 30, 2022 Funded Ratio 57.7%
Market Value of Assets: $8,248,414,597 
Actuarial Value of Assets: $8,894,328,756
Liabilities:           $15,408,995,032
Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) $6,514,666,276
Covered Payroll as of June 30, 2022: $2,004,688,456
Recommended Contribution Rate for FY 2022: 23.51% of payroll. Employees hired for the first 
time on or after January 1, 2011 contribute 4% of compensation to MOSERS. Estimated 
employer contribution is approximately $471.3 million.
Current Status of Judicial Retirement System as of June 30, 2022:
As of June 30, 2022
Funded Ratio
Market Value of Assets: $190,449,086 30.2%
Actuarial Value of Assets: $203,997,065 32.4%
Liabilities: $630,043,013
Covered Payroll as of June 30, 2021: $63,317,888
Recommended Contribution for FY22: 61.94% of payroll. Estimated dollar amount of 
contribution is $39.2 million. Employees hired for the first time on or after January 1, 2011 
contribute 4% of compensation to the retirement system. L.R. No. 2416H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1185  
Page 4 of 
March 27, 2023
JLH:LR:OD
Current Status of MPERS
As of June 30, 2022 Funded Ratio 66.33%
Market Value of Assets: $3,067,193,086
Actuarial Value of Assets: $2,925,561,398
Liabilities: $4,410,685,047
Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liabilities (UAAL) $1,485,123,649
Active Employee Payroll as of June 30, 2022: $367,493,332
Recommended Contribution Rate for FY 2022: 58% of payroll. Estimated employer contribution 
is approximately $212.7 million. Employees hired for the first time on or after January 1, 2011 
contribute 4% of compensation to MPERS.
Officials from Missouri State Employee's Retirement System (MOSERS) state the proposed 
legislation will provide clarification relative to several statutory provisions related to the 
retirement systems, Missouri State Employees’ Retirement System (MOSERS) and the Missouri 
Department of Transportation and Patrol Employees’ Retirement System (MPERS).  Most of 
these changes are minor modifications and clarifications of the retirement plans that are 
administrative in nature and intended to clarify and/or eliminate inconsistencies in the law.  
There are a couple of proposed provisions that relate solely to MOSERS.  First, the amount of 
service credit a member of the General Assembly or Statewide Elected Official can accrue while 
on long-term disability will be limited.  This modification is to reflect the application of term 
limits and could result in a de minimis savings to the long-term disability plan.  Second, the 
interest associated with employee contributions within the Judicial 2011 plan is reduced from a 
fixed 4% to the 52-week Treasury bill rate (currently, less than 1%).  This modification mirrors 
changes made to the General Employee plan under MOSERS in 2012 (SB 625). There is no 
fiscal impact from this proposal. 
Officials from MoDOT & Patrol Employees’ Retirement System (MPERS) state the 
proposed bill, if enacted, is intended to cleanup a number of statutes related to the retirement 
systems, MoDOT and Patrol Employees’ Retirement System (MPERS) and Missouri State 
Employees’ Retirement System (MOSERS). The proposed legislation either corrects errors (e.g., 
missing subsections, incorrect cross-references, delete obsolete sections, etc.) or clarifies vague 
or unclear procedures, thereby improving the efficiency of the administration of benefits. There 
is no fiscal impact from this proposal. 
Officials from the Missouri Department of Transportation assume the proposal will have no 
fiscal impact on their organization.  L.R. No. 2416H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1185  
Page 5 of 
March 27, 2023
JLH:LR:OD
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a 
direct fiscal impact on their respective organizations.  Oversight does not have any information 
to the contrary.  Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026$0$0$0FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no direct fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Missouri State Employee's Retirement System
MoDOT & Patrol Employees’ Retirement System
Missouri Department of Transportation
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorMarch 27, 2023March 27, 2023