COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:1163S.04C Bill No.:SCS for HCS for HB 631 Subject:Mining and Oil and Gas Production; Federal - State Relations; Department of
Natural Resources; Office of Administration; Counties; Licenses - Miscellaneous;
Fees; Department of Agriculture
Type:Original Date:May 1, 2023Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to administrative fees.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
General Revenue$0 or (Up to
$479,002)
$148,194 or Up
to ($206,174)$177,833$177,833
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
General
Revenue
$0 or (Up to
$479,002)
$148,194 or Up
to ($206,174)$177,833$177,833
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 2 of
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
Geologic Resources
Fund (0801)*$0$0$94,499$188,998
Oil and Gas Wells
Fund (0543)*$0$0$42,376$50,851
Hazardous Waste
Fund (0676)*$410,713$2,637,746$3,001,010$3,001,010
Solid Waste
Management Fund –
Scrap Tire
Subaccount (0569)*$0$0$1,256,718$2,513,435
Environmental
Radiation Monitoring
Fund (0656)*
$0$116,111$139,333$139,333
Mined Land
Reclamation Fund
(0906) $0$621,523$745,828$745,828
Safe Drinking Water
Fund (0679)*$0$4,635,702$5,562,842$5,562,842
Natural Resources
Protection Fund –
Air Pollution Permit
Fee Subaccount
(0594)* $0$5,469,282$6,563,138$6,563,138
Natural Resources
Protection Fund –
Water Pollution
Permit Fee
Subaccount (0568)**$0$4,827,794$5,793,353$5,793,353
Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other
State Funds$0$18,308,158$23,199,097$24,558,788
*Oversight notes this fee revenue is currently set to expire prior to January 1, 2026 (FY 2026).
This proposal extends the sunset for six years (for each fee respectively). This reflects a
continuance of the existing fees authorized in Sections 256.700, 259.080, 260.262, 260.273,
260.380, 260.392, 260.475, 444.768, 444.772, 640.100, 643.079 & 644.057.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 3 of
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FUND
AFFECTED
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Department of
Natural
Resources
Federal Funds*$0$0$0$0
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
All Federal
Funds $0$0$0$0
*Loss of $4,740,000 in federal funding offset by savings of associated 17 FTE
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND
AFFECTED
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Department of
Natural
Resources
Federal Funds(17 FTE)(17 FTE)(17 FTE)(17 FTE)
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
FTE(17 FTE)(17 FTE)(17 FTE)(17 FTE)
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☒ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Local
Government$0$0$0$0 L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 4 of
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§12.070 – Federal Mining Revenue Distribution
Officials from the Missouri Department of AgricultureDepartment of Natural Resources
and Missouri Department of Transportation each assume the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their respective organizations.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HCS for HB Nos. 948 & 915), officials from the
Missouri Department of Conservation and the Office of Administration - Budget and
Planning each assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective
organizations.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a
direct fiscal impact on their organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note for these agencies.
In a revised response from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE),
DESE stated based on their review of the legislation, it is somewhat unclear as to who distributes
these funds when they are sent to the state. DESE assumes no ITSD costs for this part of the
proposal.
Oversight assumes DESE will not be materially fiscally impacted by updating these distribution
changes and will show DESE’s zero fiscal estimate for ITSD programming.
Oversight does not have information to the contrary and therefore, Oversight will reflect the
estimates as provided by DESE.
Upon further inquiry, MDA notes the department has not received any payments from the
National Forest Receipts Program. Oversight assumes the Mark Twain National Forest is
located in the following counties:
Carter Bollinger Ozark Howell Butler Barry
Texas Taney Stone Ste. Gen. Wright Douglas
Christian Washington Ripley Iron Callaway Boone
Phelps Oregon Laclede Wayne Reynolds Crawford
Shannon St. Francois Madison Dent Pulaski
Section 163.024 - Fine Revenue for Certain School Districts L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 5 of
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
Officials from Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) believe the
potential impact is unknown based on the language as written. If the school district had to record
the Doe Run Fines as fines, it would reduce the amount of basic formula funds owed to the
school district which could be a savings to the state. If the school district has received Doe Run
Fines and it has reduced their basic formula payment DESE will be required to pay those funds
back to the district which would be a cost to the state. DESE is unable to estimate the exact
amount of the impact without knowing the amount of fines involved.
Officials from the Department of Natural Resources assume the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary.
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for this agency for this section.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HCS for HB Nos. 948 & 915), officials from the
Office of Administration - Budget and Planning (B&P) stated B&P defers to the Department
of Natural Resources for potential impacts to the county school funds based on their issuance of
penalties authorized in this section. To the extent that any additional revenues to the county
school funds are considered fines that could impact school finances, B&P defers to the
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for the potential impact.
Previously, DESE stated the fines paid into the Iron County school fund are from the Doe Run
mine settlement and if those fines had to be included in the districts local effort calculations it
would result in a lower foundation formula to those districts.
That being said, the last time these same fines where paid, this exact same law was in place to
prevent the large fine amount from devastating the amount of foundation formula the affected
districts would receive. So the reply was in reference to the fact that last time these same fines
were paid they were not included as part of the local effort deduction.
But there would officially be a lower formula call if this law were not in place, but at this time
DESE does not have enough information in order to estimate that.
Oversight notes the following school districts appear to be located in Iron County:
∙
∙
∙
∙
Per the second amended and restated Administrative Order on Consent No. APCP-2019-001 the
penalty to be paid by the respondents is $1,200,000 in three annual payments of $400,000, a
fourth payment of $354,368 plus an additional payment of $384,771.
Based on information provided by DNR, Oversight notes the first two payments of $400,000
have been paid as well as the payment for $384,771 for a total of $1,184,771. The remaining L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 6 of
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
payment of $400,000 was due by September 9, 2022 and a fourth payment of $354,368 is due
September 8, 2023.
Based on information provided by DESE, Oversight notes some of the school districts located in
Iron County are considered hold harmless and the state aid payment would not change regardless
of the whether the fine revenue is included in the calculation of local effort for districts
considered hold harmless. However, two of the districts are not considered hold harmless and
any fine revenue not included in the calculation of local effort as a result of this proposal would
result in a dollar for dollar increase in the state aid calculation. Therefore, Oversight will show a
range of impact from $0 (districts impacted are considered hold harmless) to a potential
increased call to the foundation formula.
Oversight anticipates the exclusion of the fine revenue from the calculation of local effort would
not impact the foundation formula until the year following remittance. Therefore, Oversight will
show a cost for General Revenue beginning in FY 2024 for an amount equal to the fine revenue
of $400,000 followed by $354,368 in FY 2025.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, county commissioners, and school districts were requested to respond to this proposed
legislation but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative
Information System (MOLIS) database is available upon request.
§§196.311, 196.316, 323.100 & 413.225 – Missouri Department of Agriculture Fees
Officials from the Missouri Department of Agriculture (MDA)
no fiscal impact on their organization. MDA notes the provisions in this proposal will allow
MDA to collect the same amount of revenue as it currently does.
Oversight notes the proposal sets the following annual fee limits:
Dealer’s licence for eggs $100
Retailer’s license for eggs $175
Processor’s license for eggs $250
Testing of meters for liquefied petroleum gas $400
Calibrations testing $500 per calibration
Oversight notes the new fee limits become effective January, 2025 and allow the MDA
additional flexibility in setting the annual fees. Oversight assumes there will be no direct
additional fiscal impact to the MDA.
§§256.700, 259.080, 260.262, 260.273, 260.380, 260.392, 260.475, 444.768, 444.772, 640.100,
643.079 & 644.057 – Extension of Department of Natural Resources Fees L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 7 of
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
Officials from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) assume the proposal will have no
fiscal impact on their organization.
DNR notes the following amounts have been collected for the various fees:
§256.700 – Geologic Resources Fund (0801) (in response to SB 109 (2023))
FY 2020 $200,585
FY 2021 $180,593
FY 2022 $185,816
Oversight notes there was a $232,585 balance in the Geologic Resources Fund as of January 31,
2023. Oversight will reflect revenue in the amount of $188,998 (average of past three fiscal
years) continuing due to the fee extension from 2025 to 2031 on the fiscal note.
§259.080 – Oil and Gas Well Resources Fund (0543)
FY 2020 $57,548
FY 2021 $46,155
FY 2022 $48,851
Oversight notes there was a $324,596 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023. Oversight
will reflect revenue in the amount of $50,851 (average of past three fiscal years) continuing due
to the fee extension from 2025 to 2031 on the fiscal note.
§260.262 – Lead-Acid Battery Fee (Hazardous Waste Fund 0676)
FY 2020 $757,417
FY 2021 $842,281
FY 2022 $864,578
Oversight notes there was an $11,131,094 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023.
Oversight will reflect revenue in the amount of $821,425 (average of past three fiscal years)
continuing due to the fee extension from 2023 to 2029 on the fiscal note.
§260.273 – Scrap Tire Fee (Solid Waste Management – Scrap Tire Fund Subaccount Fund 0569)
FY 2020 $2,481,163
FY 2021 $2,015,512
FY 2022 $3,043,631
Oversight notes there was a $7,121,634 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023. Oversight
will reflect revenue in the amount of $2,513,435 (average of past three fiscal years) continuing
due to the fee extension from 2025 to 2031 on the fiscal note. L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 8 of
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
§260.380 – Hazardous Waste Generator Fee (Hazardous Waste Fund 0676)
FY 2020 $1,900,159
FY 2021 $1,920,783
FY 2022 $1,816,939
Oversight notes there was an $11,131,094 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023. Oversight
will reflect revenue in the amount of $1,879,294 (average of past three fiscal years) continuing
due to the fee extension from 2024 to 2030 on the fiscal note.
§260.392 – Environmental Radiation Monitoring Transport Fee (Environmental Radiation
Monitoring Fund (0656)
FY 2020 $134,000
FY 2021 $102,725
FY 2022 $181,275
Oversight notes there was an $181,046 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023. Oversight
will reflect revenue in the amount of $139,333 (average of past three fiscal years) continuing due
to the fee extension from 2024 to 2030 on the fiscal note.
§260.475 – Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Fee (Hazardous Waste Fund 0676)
FY 2020 $305,370
FY 2021 $335,681
FY 2022 $259,822
Oversight notes there was an $11,131,094 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023.
Oversight will reflect revenue in the amount of $300,291 (average of past three fiscal years)
continuing due to the fee extension from 2024 to 2030 on the fiscal note.
§§444.768 & 444.772 – Surface Mining -Land Reclamation Act (Mined Land Reclamation Fund
0906)
FY 2020 $773,335 (Mined Land Reclamation Fund) $145,500 (General Revenue)
FY 2021 $704,629 (Mined Land Reclamation Fund) $194,000 (General Revenue)
FY 2022 $759,521 (Mined Land Reclamation Fund) $194,000 (General Revenue)
Oversight notes there was a $1,615,826 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023. Oversight
will reflect revenue in the amount of $745,828 for the Mined Land Reclamation Fund and
$177,833 for the General Revenue Fund (average of past three fiscal years) continuing due to the
fee extension from 2024 to 2030 on the fiscal note. L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 9 of
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
§640.100 – Safe Drinking Water Fund (0679)
FY 2020 $5,295,605
FY 2021 $5,455,159
FY 2022 $5,937,761
Oversight notes there was an $8,925,790 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023. Oversight
will reflect revenue in the amount of $5,562,842 (average of past three fiscal years) continuing
due to the fee extension from 2024 to 2030 on the fiscal note.
§643.079 – Clean Air Fees – Emissions and Permit Fees (Natural Resources Protection Fund –
Air Pollution Permit Fee Subaccount (0594)
FY 2020 $6,268,040
FY 2021 $6,339,541
FY 2022 $7,081,832
Oversight notes there was a $3,356,322 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023. Oversight
will reflect revenue in the amount of $6,563,138 (average of past three fiscal years) continuing
due to the fee extension from 2024 to 2030 on the fiscal note.
§644.057 – Clean Water Fee (Natural Resources Protection Fund – Water Pollution Permit Fee
Subaccount 0568)
FY 2020 $5,490,416
FY 2021 $5,574,843
FY 2022 $6,314,800 (higher due to land disturbance being due every five years)
Oversight notes there was a $26,039,664 balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2023. Oversight
will reflect revenue in the amount of $5,793,353 (average of past three fiscal years) continuing
due to the fee extension from 2024 to 2030 on the fiscal note.
§256.710 – Industrial Minerals Advisory Council
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HCS for SB 109), officials from the Department of
Natural Resources assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their organization.
Officials from the Missouri Department of Transportation assume the proposal will have no
fiscal impact on their organization.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for these agencies for this section.
§§640.099 & 644.051 – Clean Water Law L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 10 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
Officials from the Department of Natural Resources assume the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary.
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for this agency for these
sections.
§644.016 – Provisions Relating to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
Officials from the Department of Natural Resources assume Section 644.016(25) removes
“and nonpoint source pursuant to any federal water pollution control act”. The Department,
through its federal delegated authority, is responsible for assessing the quality of Missouri’s
water and identifying impaired waters, the pollutant impairment, and the source of the
impairment for purposes of 303d listings. Removal of nonpoint sources of pollution under the
federal clean water act could result in more involvement from United States Environmental
Protection Agency, oversight of activities in the state, and loss of nonpoint source grant funding
for both administration and pass-through project funding.
The Department would lose approximately $4,740,000 dollars in federal funding. Of the $4.7M,
$2,454,800 is pass-through project funds. Losing this federal funding would create a loss of 17
FTE* for the Department. (The $4,740,000 in federal funding includes the Personal Service and
Expense & Equipment tied to the 17 FTE.) The federal impacts of loss of grant funding and cost
avoidance were netted to $0.
DNR notes there would be a loss of $1,556,800 in 319h Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant
funds. This amount represents 40% of the total annual grant award amount. This is a cost
avoidance/savings for the Water Pollution Permit Fee Fund as the work activities would end with
the loss of the federal funds and the department; therefore, would no longer have to meet the
40% match requirement.
In addition, the following federal funds would be affected:
319 Project Funding - $1,946,000
319 Public Participation Grant Funding - $1,946,000
604B Funding - $ 848,000
Total $4,740,000
Oversight does not have information to the contrary and therefore, Oversight will reflect the
estimates as provided by the DNR. L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 11 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
GENERAL REVENUE
FUND
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2024 to 2030 (§§444.768
& 444.772) p. 9$0$148,194$177,833$177,833
Cost - increased call to the
foundation formula if the
increase in specific fine
revenue is not include in
the calculation of local
effort (§163.024) p. 5
$0 or (Up to
$400,000)
$0 or (Up to
$354,368)$0 $0
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
GENERAL REVENUE
FUND
$0 or (Up to
$479,002)
$148,194 or
Up to
($206,174)$177,833$177,833
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government (continued)
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
GEOLOGIC
RESOURCES FUND
(0801)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from $188,998 L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 12 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
2025 to 2031 (§256.700)
p. 7 $0$0$94,499
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
GEOLOGIC
RESOURCES FUND
(0801)$0$0$94,499$188,998
OIL AND GAS WELLS
RESOURCE FUND
(0543)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2025 to 2031 (§259.080)
p. 7 $0$0$42,376$50,851
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE OIL
AND GAS WELLS
RESOURCE FUND
(0543)$0$0$42,376$50,851
HAZARDOUS WASTE
FUND (0676)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2023 to 2029 (§260.262)
p. 7$410,713$821,425$821,425$821,425
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2024 to 2030 (§260.380)
p. 8 $0$1,566,078$1,879,294$1,879,294
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2024 to 2030 (§260.475)
p. 8 $0$250,243$300,291$300,291 L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 13 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government (cont.)
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
HAZARDOUS WASTE
FUND (0676)$410,713$2,637,746$3,001,010$3,001,010
SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT –
SCRAP TIRE
SUBACCOUNT (0569)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2025 to 2031 (§260.273)
p. 8 $0$0$1,256,718$2,513,435
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT –
SCRAP TIRE
SUBACCOUNT (0569)$0$0$1,256,718$2,513,435
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government (continued)
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
ENVIRONMENTAL
RADIATION
MONITORING FUND
(0656)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2024 to 2030 (§260.392)
p. 8 $0$116,111$139,333$139,333 L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 14 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government (cont.)
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECTON THE
ENVIRONMENTAL
RADIATION
MONITORING FUND
(0656)$0$116,111$139,333$139,333
MINED LAND
RECLAMATION
FUND (0906)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2024 to 2030 (§§444,768
& 444.772) p. 9$0$621,523$745,828$745,828
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECTON THE
MINED LAND
RECLAMATION
FUND (0906)$0$621,523$745,828$745,828
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government (continued)
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
SAFE DRINKING
WATER FUND (0679)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2024 to 2030 (§640.100)
p. 9 $0$4,635,702$5,562,842$5,562,842 L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 15 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government (cont.)
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
SAFE DRINKING
WATER FUND (0679)$0$4,635,702$5,562,842$5,562,842
NATURAL
RESOURCES
PROTECTION FUND –
AIR POLLUTION
PERMIT FEE
SUBACCOUTN (0594)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2024 to 2030 (§643.079)
p. 9 $0$5,469,282$6,563,138$6,563,138
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
NATURAL
RESOURCES
PROTECTION FUND –
AIR POLLUTION
PERMIT FEE
SUBACCOUNT (0594)$0$5,469,282$6,563,138$6,563,138
NATURAL
RESOURCES
PROTECTION FUND –
WATER POLLUTION
PERMIT FEE
SUBACCOUNT (0568)
Revenue Extension –
extension of fee from
2024 to 2030 (§644.057)
p. 9 $0$4,827,794$5,793,353$5,793,353 L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 16 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government (cont.)
FY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
Savings – DNR – cost
avoidance due to loss of
grant funds and program
(§644.016) p. 12$1,556,800$1,556,800$1,556,800$1,556,800
Loss – DNR - (§644.016)
p. 12($1,556,800)($1,556,800)($1,556,800)($1,556,800)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
NATURAL
RESOURCES
PROTECTION FUND –
WATER POLLUTION
PERMIT FEE
SUBACCOUNT (0568)$0$4,827,794$5,793,353$5,793,353
DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL
RESOURCES
FEDERAL FUNDS
Savings – DNR – 17 FTE
and associated costs that
were paid for with federal
funds (§644.016) p. 12$4,740,000$4,740,000$4,740,000$4,740,000
Loss – DNR – federal
funding due to removing
provision regarding
nonpoint sources of water
(§644.016) p. 12($4,740,000)($4,740,000)($4,740,000)($4,740,000)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON
DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL
RESOURCES
FEDERAL FUNDS$0$0$0$0 L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 17 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Estimated Net FTE
Change to Department of
Natural Resources Federal
Funds(17 FTE)(17 FTE)(17 FTE)(17 FTE)
FISCAL IMPACT
– Local
Government
FY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
COUNTIESCounties - where
mining occurs
(§12.070) p. 4
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
Counties – where
mining does not
occur (§12.070) p.
4
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)$0 or (Unknown
ESTIMATED
NET EFFECT
ON COUNTIES$0$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
Small businesses that are required to pay the fees mentioned above could be impacted as a result
of this proposal.
Small agriculture businesses could be impacted as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This proposal extends fees for programs within the Department of Natural Resources.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space. L.R. No. 1163S.04C
Bill No. SCS for HCS for HB 631
Page 18 of 18
May 1, 2023
KB:LR:OD
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Missouri Department of Agriculture
Office of Administration - Budget and Planning
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Natural Resources
Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Department of Transportation
Department of Natural Resources
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorMay 1, 2023May 1, 2023